Clinical and molecular factors for selection of nivolumab or irinotecan as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Ishii, Takahiro [1 ,2 ]
Kawazoe, Akihito [1 ]
Sasaki, Akinori [1 ]
Mishima, Saori [1 ]
Kentaro, Sawada [1 ]
Nakamura, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Kotani, Daisuke [1 ]
Kuboki, Yasutoshi [1 ]
Taniguchi, Hiroya [1 ]
Kojima, Takashi [1 ]
Doi, Toshihiko [1 ]
Yoshino, Takayuki [1 ]
Kuwata, Takeshi [3 ]
Ishii, Genichiro [2 ,3 ]
Shitara, Kohei [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp East, Dept Gastroenterol & Gastrointestinal Oncol, Natl Canc Ctr, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778577, Japan
[2] Juntendo Univ, Grad Sch Med, Courses Adv Clin Res Canc, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Hosp East, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol & Clin Labs, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
关键词
clinical and molecular factors; gastric cancer; irinotecan; nivolumab; third-line or later-line treatment; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; SUPPORTIVE CARE; DOUBLE-BLIND; CHEMOTHERAPY; PLUS; MONOTHERAPY; METASTASIS; PACLITAXEL; PLATINUM; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/1758835920942377
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The use of nivolumab or irinotecan as the third-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial. Methods: This study analyzed patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan (nivolumab group or irinotecan group, respectively) from May 2016 to April 2019 following two or more previous lines of chemotherapy. Univariate survival analysis was conducted to identify the clinical and molecular factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 156 patients (74 treated with nivolumab and 82 treated with irinotecan) were analyzed. The median PFS was 1.9 months in both treatment groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.2 and 6.2 months in the nivolumab and irinotecan groups, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or more, liver metastasis, a large tumor size at baseline, and HER2-positive status were associated with a worse PFS in the nivolumab group compared with the irinotecan group. The nivolumab group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 3.1versus2.0 months) and OS (median 12.9versus7.8 months) than the irinotecan group in patients with 0 or 1 of these factors, whereas the irinotecan group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 1.0versus1.8 months) and a trend of longer OS (median 3.9versus6.1 months) in patients with > 2 of these factors. Conclusions: Some clinical and molecular factors were associated with outcomes following nivolumab or irinotecan as the third- or later-line treatment in patients with AGC. These factors must be considered while selecting an optimal treatment option.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Successful Conversion Surgery for Stage IV Gastric Cancer after Nivolumab Monotherapy as Third-Line Chemotherapy
    Watanabe, Hayato
    Fujikawa, Hirohito
    Komori, Keisuke
    Kano, Kazuki
    Takahashi, Kosuke
    Yamada, Takanobu
    Inokuchi, Yasuhiro
    Machida, Nozomu
    Yokose, Tomoyuki
    Rino, Yasushi
    Masuda, Munetaka
    Ogata, Takashi
    Oshima, Takashi
    CASE REPORTS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 15 (02) : 562 - 567
  • [42] THIRD-LINE FOLFIRI IN METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS
    Caparello, C.
    Vasile, E.
    Lencioni, M.
    Fabrini, M. G.
    Lucchesi, M.
    Ginocchi, L.
    Caponi, S.
    Santi, S.
    Ricci, S.
    Falcone, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 251 - 251
  • [43] Prognostic factor analysis of third-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
    Yang, D. H.
    Bae, W. K.
    Hwang, J.
    Yoon, J.
    Chung, I.
    Shim, H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy in the third-line treatment of small cell lung cancer
    Smare, Caitlin
    Dave, Kiran
    Juarez-Garcia, Ariadna
    Abraham, Pranav
    Penrod, John R.
    Camidge, D. Ross
    Yuan, Yong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 24 (01) : 1124 - 1133
  • [45] Third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Yu
    Zhu, Xu-Qing
    Ren, Xiao-Gang
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (24)
  • [46] THIRD-LINE FOLFIRI IN METASTASIC GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS
    Ginocchi, Laura
    Caparello, Chiara
    Caponi, Sara
    Lucchesi, Maurizio
    Lencioni, Monica
    Vasile, Enrico
    Fornaro, Lorenzo
    Masi, Gianluca
    Ricci, Sergio
    Falcone, Alfredo
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 : v41 - v41
  • [47] Efficacy of apatinib as third-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer and prognostic analysis
    Wang, Juchao
    Sun, Qiang
    Zhao, Jian
    Li, Zengming
    Kou, Dan
    Qu, Dongxiang
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2021, 26 (01): : 93 - 100
  • [48] Association of disease progression pattern during third-line chemotherapy with nivolumab with poor prognosis in advanced gastric cancer: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan
    Kadowaki, Shigenori
    Aoki, Masahiko
    Suzuki, Takeshi
    Takahashi, Naoki
    Shirasu, Hiromichi
    Ando, Takayuki
    Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki
    Kawakami, Kentaro
    Kito, Yosuke
    Matsumoto, Toshihiko
    Shimozaki, Keitaro
    Miyazaki, Yasuhiro
    Yamaguchi, Toshifumi
    Akiyoshi, Kohei
    Baba, Eishi
    Makiyama, Akitaka
    Nakashima, Koji
    Sugimoto, Naotoshi
    Nagashima, Kengo
    Boku, Narikazu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (04)
  • [49] Third-Line Treatment Options for Kidney Cancer
    Posadas, Edwin M.
    Limvorasak, Suwicha
    Figlin, Robert A.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2016, 30 (09): : 813 - +
  • [50] Biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan as third-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil
    Pfeiffer, P.
    Nielsen, D.
    Bjerregaard, J.
    Qvortrup, C.
    Yilmaz, M.
    Jensen, B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) : 1141 - 1145