Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review

被引:38
|
作者
Jain, Sneha Rajiv [1 ]
Sui, Yuan [1 ]
Ng, Cheng Han [1 ]
Chen, Zhi Xiong [2 ,3 ]
Goh, Lay Hoon [4 ]
Shorey, Shefaly [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Physiol, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Med Educ, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Div Family Med, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Alice Lee Ctr Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
NATIONAL STANDARDS; INTERVENTION; ENABLEMENT; EDUCATORS; COMMUNITY; BARRIERS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0237647
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Diabetes self-management education is a key aspect in the long-term management of type 2 diabetes. The patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspective on the use of technology-assisted DSME has yet to be studied. Hence, the objective of this study was to better understand the factors that facilitate or hinder the adoptions of such education by adults with type 2 diabetes and their HCPs. Methods We systematically searched five databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and PsycINFO) until August 2019. The search included qualitative and mixed-method studies that reported the views of patients and HCPs regarding features, uses, and implementations of technology-assisted DSME. Data were synthesized through an inductive thematic analysis. Results A total of 13 articles were included, involving 242 patients, ranging from 18 to 81 years and included web-based, mobile application, digital versatile disc (DVD), virtual reality or telehealth interventions. Patients and HCPs had mixed views towards features of the technology-assisted interventions, with patients' personal qualities and HCPs' concerns affecting uses of the interventions. Patients generally preferred technologies that were easy to access, use, and apply and that had reliable information. Patients' ambitions motivated them, and personal attributes such as poor competence with technology, poor literacy, and language barriers acted as barriers. Patients especially liked the peer support that they received but did not like it when there was no regulation of advice on these platforms. HCPs believed that while the interventions were useful to patients, they faced difficulties with integration into their clinical workflows. Conclusion This review explored the features of technology-assisted diabetes self-management education interventions that enhanced positive patient engagements and the negative aspects of both the platforms and the target groups. Technical support and training will be effective in managing these concerns and ensuring meaningful use of these platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Telehealth for diabetes self-management in primary healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    So, Chi F.
    Chung, Joanne W. Y.
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2018, 24 (05) : 356 - 364
  • [42] Self-Management of HIV and Diabetes in African American Women: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature
    Zuniga, Julie A.
    Wright, Charlotte
    Fordyce, Jonathan
    Ohueri, Chelsi West
    Garcia, Alexandra A.
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2018, 44 (05): : 419 - 434
  • [43] Understanding healthcare professionals' perspectives on Nepalese patients' diabetes management
    Sapkota, S.
    Brien, J. -A.
    Aslani, P.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2016, 12 (05): : E23 - E24
  • [44] A systematic review of qualitative research on the self-management experience of breast cancer patients
    Sun, Xi-Bo
    Su, He-Peng
    Jiang, He
    Wang, Bing
    Lu, Shuai
    Qu, Jin-Xiu
    Li, Xiang-Qi
    Rao, Ben-Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 39 (04): : 1131 - 1145
  • [45] Self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes: Group-based versus individual education. A systematic review with meta- analysis of randomized trails
    Mannucci, Edoardo
    Giaccari, Andrea
    Gallo, Marco
    Bonifazi, Allegra
    Belen, Avila D. P.
    Masini, Maria L.
    Trento, Marina
    Monami, Matteo
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2022, 32 (02) : 330 - 336
  • [46] Effectiveness of self-management programmes in diabetes management: A systematic review
    Vas, Aldrin
    Devi, Elsa Sanatombi
    Vidyasagar, Sudha
    Acharya, Raviraja
    Rau, Nileshwar Radhakrishna
    George, Anice
    Jose, Tessy
    Nayak, Baby
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2017, 23 (05)
  • [47] Healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of osteoporosis medication treatment: a qualitative systematic review
    Rezae, Fatima
    Kelly, Ayano
    Dey, Sagarika
    Moles, Rebekah
    Carter, Stephen
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [48] Public mobile chronic obstructive pulmonary disease applications for self-management: Patients and healthcare professionals' perspectives
    Quach, Shirley
    Benoit, Adam
    Packham, Tara L.
    Goldstein, Roger
    Brooks, Dina
    HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (04)
  • [49] Self-reported barriers in self-management of women with gestational diabetes: A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Xu, Nuo
    Han, Xia
    Chen, Sijing
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Gu, Ping
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (11): : 7130 - 7143
  • [50] Self-management activities in diabetes care: a systematic review
    Coyle, Meaghan E.
    Francis, Karen
    Chapman, Ysanne
    AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2013, 37 (04) : 513 - 522