A PRO-cision Medicine Methods Toolkit to Address the Challenges of Personalizing Cancer Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Introduction to the Supplement

被引:32
|
作者
Snyder, Claire [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brundage, Michael [4 ]
Rivera, Yonaira M. [2 ]
Wu, Albert W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Queens Canc Res Inst, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
patient-reported outcomes; cancer; interpretation; methods; guidance; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; ROUTINE PRACTICE; IMPROVE; HEALTH; SCORES; COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION; SYSTEM; PATIENTVIEWPOINT;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0000000000001089
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Patients are increasingly being asked to complete standardized, validated questionnaires with regard to their symptoms, functioning, and well-being [ie, patient-reported outcomes (PROs)] as part of routine care. These PROs can be used to inform patients' care and management, which we refer to as "PRO-cision Medicine." For PRO-cision Medicine to be most effective, clinicians and patients need to be able to understand what the PRO scores mean and how to act on the PRO results. The papers in this supplement to Medical Care describe various methods that have been used to address these issues. Specifically, the supplement includes 14 papers: 6 describe different methods for interpreting PROs and 8 describe how different PRO systems have addressed interpreting PRO scores and/or acting on PRO results. As such, this "Methods Toolkit" can inform clinicians and researchers aiming to implement routine PRO reporting into clinical practice by providing methodological fundamentals and real-world examples to promote personalized patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / S7
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Could existing infrastructure for using patient-reported outcomes as quality measures also be used for individual care in patients with colorectal cancer?
    Breidenbach, Clara
    Kowalski, Christoph
    Wesselmann, Simone
    Sibert, Nora Tabea
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [22] Mobile and comprehensive assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in routine inpatient cancer care: A three-arm randomized controlled feasibility study.
    Salm, Hanna
    Hentschel, Leopold
    Kramer, Michael
    Pink, Daniel
    Schuler, Markus K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [23] Routine Surveillance of Chemotherapy Toxicities in Cancer Patients Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
    Tian Qi Wang
    Joseph N. Samuel
    M. Catherine Brown
    Ashlee Vennettilli
    Hannah Solomon
    Lawson Eng
    Mindy Liang
    Gursharan Gill
    Zahra Merali
    Chenchen Tian
    Nicholas Y. H. Cheng
    Matthew Campbell
    Devalben Patel
    Ai Xin Liu
    Geoffrey Liu
    Doris Howell
    Oncology and Therapy, 2018, 6 (2) : 189 - 201
  • [24] Routine Surveillance of Chemotherapy Toxicities in Cancer Patients Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
    Wang, Tian Qi
    Samuel, Joseph N.
    Brown, M. Catherine
    Vennettilli, Ashlee
    Solomon, Hannah
    Eng, Lawson
    Liang, Mindy
    Gill, Gursharan
    Merali, Zahra
    Tian, Chenchen
    Cheng, Nicholas Y. H.
    Campbell, Matthew
    Patel, Devalben
    Liu, Ai Xin
    Liu, Geoffrey
    Howell, Doris
    ONCOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2018, 6 (02) : 189 - 201
  • [25] Methodological standards for using the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) in cancer clinical trials Comment
    Basch, Ethan
    Thanarajasingam, Gita
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 19 (03) : 274 - 276
  • [26] Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Clinical Care Using Electronic Administration and Telehealth Technologies: Realist Synthesis of Potential Mechanisms for Improving Health Outcomes
    Govindaraj, Ramkumar
    Agar, Meera
    Currow, David
    Luckett, Tim
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [27] Development of a comprehensive patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment model for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) research and clinical care: A mixed methods study
    Rutherford, Claudia
    King, Madeleine T.
    Costa, Daniel S. J.
    Smith, David P.
    Patel, Manish I.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 200 - 200
  • [28] Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies
    Stover, Angela M.
    Stricker, Carrie Tompkins
    Hammelef, Karen
    Henson, Sydney
    Carr, Philip
    Jansen, Jennifer
    Deal, Allison M.
    Bennett, Antonia V.
    Basch, Ethan M.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2019, 57 (05) : S92 - S99
  • [29] USING THE PEDIATRIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES-COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS (PRO-CTCAE) TO LONGITUDINALLY MEASURE SYMPTOM EXPERIENCES OF CHILDREN WITH ADVANCED CANCER
    Montgomery, Kitty
    Raybin, Jennifer
    Ward, Jessica
    Brown, Roger
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2022, 49 (02) : E159 - E160
  • [30] "The Tool Created a Chance to Discuss Topics You Dont Normally Address in Diabetes Consultations": A Study of Using Patient-Reported Outcomes to Promote Person-Centered Care and Psychosocial Support
    Joensen, Lene E.
    Schultz, Astrid A.
    Madsen, Kristoffer P.
    Persson, Frederik
    Norgaard, Kirsten
    Willaing, Ingrid
    DIABETES, 2020, 69