Disarming Libya? A reassessment after the Arab Spring

被引:4
|
作者
Busch, Nathan E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Pilat, Joseph F. [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Christopher Newport Univ, Newport News, VA 23606 USA
[2] CNU, Ctr Amer Studies, Newport News, VA 23606 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[6] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Natl Secur Off, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[7] Woodrow Wilson Int Ctr Scholars, Nonproliferat Forum, Washington, DC USA
[8] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[9] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[10] Coll William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-2346.12027
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
In 2011, several months after a popular revolt overturned the Gaddafi regime in Libya, Libya's new National Transitional Council announced the discovery of what was later confirmed to be an undeclared stockpile of chemical weapons. This was a startling announcement to many observers, since Libya had publicly renounced its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programmes in 2003 and had apparently dismantled the programmes soon after. Although the Libyan case had repeatedly been referred to as a positive model' for nonproliferationan instance where a country had voluntarily and peacefully rolled back its WMD programsthis recent discovery forces us to wonder whether the Libyan model' really was as successful as initially described. This article examines the successes, challenges and lessons that can be learned from the Libyan case of WMD renunciation and verification. As one model of cooperative verification, the Libyan case highlights not only the opportunities afforded by monitoring and verification regimes, but also some of the difficulties that any such regime will encounter in real-world circumstances, however positive.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 475
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条