A Belief Revision Method Based On Argumentative Dialogue Model

被引:0
|
作者
Yin Deng [1 ]
Yong OuYang [1 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
certainty-factor based argumentative framework; argumentative dialog tree; belief revision; LOGIC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Belief is Agents' cognition of surrounding. Due to the dynamics of the environment, the new received belief may be conflicted with the original belief set when an agent got new information. Belief revision is to make sure the new belief set is a conflict-free set in this moment. This paper proposes a combined with debate way of belief revision, which use certainty-factor based argumentative framework to represent the uncertainty of knowledge and uncertainty reasoning, to get a belief set with the corresponding certainty factor. Finally the result belief set will be received by a setting certainty-factor threshold value. Proved by the experiment, the new accepted belief may not be included in the revised credible belief set, and credible belief set is conflict-free. Belief revision algorithm, therefore, have broken the traditional way of belief revision, and effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 562
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emotion Recognition Based Preference Modelling in Argumentative Dialogue Systems
    Rach, Niklas
    Weber, Klaus
    Aicher, Annalena
    Lingenfelser, Florian
    Andre, Elisabeth
    Minker, Wolfgang
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), 2019, : 838 - 843
  • [22] Belief revision based on incomplete valuations
    Xiao W.-J.
    Zhu Z.-H.
    Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2010, 21 (01): : 47 - 54
  • [23] Scientific discovery based on belief revision
    Martin, E
    Osherson, D
    JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1997, 62 (04) : 1352 - 1370
  • [24] Believability based iterated belief revision
    Yang, P
    Gao, Y
    Chen, ZQ
    Chen, SF
    PRICAI 2004: TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3157 : 936 - 937
  • [25] Effect of argumentative goals in the quality of argumentative dialogue and written argumentation
    Villarroel, Constanza
    Garcia-Mila, Merce
    Felton, Mark
    Miralda-Banda, Andrea
    INFANCIA Y APRENDIZAJE, 2019, 42 (01): : 37 - 86
  • [27] The complexity of model checking for belief revision and update
    Liberatore, P
    Schaerf, M
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE EIGHTH INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 556 - 561
  • [28] Belief revision and update: Complexity of model checking
    Liberatore, P
    Schaerf, M
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2001, 62 (01) : 43 - 72
  • [29] Credibility Dynamics: A belief-revision-based trust model with pairwise comparisons
    Jelenc, David
    Tamargo, Luciano H.
    Gottifredi, Sebastian
    Garcia, Alejandro J.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 293
  • [30] A structured dialogue tool for argumentative learning
    Hirsch, L
    Saeedi, M
    Cornillon, J
    Litosseliti, L
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2004, 20 (01) : 72 - 80