Linearly Additive Shape and Color Signals in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex

被引:21
|
作者
McMahon, David B. T.
Olson, Carl R.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Mellon Inst, Ctr Neural Basis Cognit, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurosci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
VISUAL-SEARCH; FEATURE-INTEGRATION; NEURAL MECHANISMS; MACAQUE; NEURONS; BINDING; OBJECTS; SYNCHRONY; ATTENTION; STIMULUS;
D O I
10.1152/jn.90650.2008
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
McMahon DBT, Olson CR. Linearly additive shape and color signals in monkey inferotemporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 101: 1867-1875, 2009. First published January 14, 2009; doi: 10.1152/jn.90650.2008. How does the brain represent a red circle? One possibility is that there is a specialized and possibly time-consuming process whereby the attributes of shape and color, carried by separate populations of neurons in low-order visual cortex, are bound together into a unitary neural representation. Another possibility is that neurons in high-order visual cortex are selective, by virtue of their bottom-up input from low-order visual areas, for particular conjunctions of shape and color. A third possibility is that they simply sum shape and color signals linearly. We tested these ideas by measuring the responses of inferotemporal cortex neurons to sets of stimuli in which two attributes-shape and color-varied independently. We find that a few neurons exhibit conjunction selectivity but that in most neurons the influences of shape and color sum linearly. Contrary to the idea of conjunction coding, few neurons respond selectively to a particular combination of shape and color. Contrary to the idea that binding requires time, conjunction signals, when present, occur as early as feature signals. We argue that neither conjunction selectivity nor a specialized feature binding process is necessary for the effective representation of shapecolor combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:1867 / 1875
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex
    Brincat, SL
    Connor, CE
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 7 (08) : 880 - 886
  • [42] Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex
    Scott L Brincat
    Charles E Connor
    Nature Neuroscience, 2004, 7 : 880 - 886
  • [43] Representing the Forest before the Trees: A Global Advantage Effect in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
    Sripati, Arun P.
    Olson, Carl R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (24): : 7788 - 7796
  • [44] Explicit representation of 3D object parts in monkey inferotemporal cortex
    Yamane, Yukako
    Carlson, Eric
    Wang, Zhihong
    Bowman, Katherine
    Connor, Charles E.
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2007, 58 : S153 - S153
  • [45] Trade-off between object selectivity and tolerance in monkey inferotemporal cortex
    Zoccolan, Davide
    Kouh, Minjoon
    Poggio, Tomaso
    DiCarlo, James J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (45): : 12292 - 12307
  • [46] Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex
    Leopold, David A.
    Bondar, Igor V.
    Giese, Martin A.
    NATURE, 2006, 442 (7102) : 572 - 575
  • [47] Independent Neuronal Representation of Facial and Vocal Identity in the Monkey Hippocampus and Inferotemporal Cortex
    Sliwa, Julia
    Plante, Aurelie
    Duhamel, Jean-Rene
    Wirth, Sylvia
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2016, 26 (03) : 950 - 966
  • [48] The effect of visual stimulus duration on selectivity of neural responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex
    Mirpour, Koorosh
    Esteky, Hossein
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2006, 55 : S56 - S56
  • [49] A multielectrode study of the inferotemporal cortex in the monkey: effects of grouping on spike rates and synchrony
    Anderson, B
    Harrison, M
    Sheinberg, DL
    NEUROREPORT, 2006, 17 (04) : 407 - 411
  • [50] Relationship between stimulus complexity and neuronal activity in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey
    Sáry, G
    Chadaide, Z
    Tompa, T
    Kovács, G
    Köteles, K
    Boda, K
    Raduly, L
    Benedek, G
    COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 22 (01): : 1 - 12