Evaluation of a low-intensity shockwave therapy for chronic prostatitis type IIIb/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a double-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial

被引:18
|
作者
Mykoniatis, Ioannis [1 ]
Kalyvianakis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Zilotis, Filimon [1 ]
Kapoteli, Paraskevi [1 ]
Fournaraki, Agrippina [1 ]
Poulios, Evangelos [1 ]
Hatzichristou, Dimitrios [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, G Gennimatas Hosp, Dept Urol 1, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
WAVE-THERAPY;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-020-00284-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Currently, there is no efficacious treatment method for chronic prostatitis type IIIb/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Aim of the study was to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) vs. sham treatment in CP/CPPS patients. Methods Patients with CP/CPPS diagnosis were randomized in this prospective, sham-controlled, double-blind study either to the active groups (Group B, C) who received 5000 shockwaves per session with energy flux density 0.1 mJ/mm(2)or to the sham group (Group A) who received 5000 shockwaves from a visually identical sham probe. All groups underwent six sessions (once/week). LiST effects on pain, micturition, quality of life (QoL), and erectile function were evaluated at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment. The parameters were investigated using validated questionnaires. Uroflowmetry and post void residual calculation were performed at baseline and at 4- and 12-week FU visit. Prostate mpMRI and PSA measurement were performed at baseline and 12-week FU visit. Results Overall, 45 men were randomized to the active (n = 30) and sham groups (n = 15). Regarding impact of LiST in National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total, pain, and QoL subdomains scores a clear and persistent in all FU timepoints improvement was found compared to sham treatment. NIH-CPSI urinary subdomain, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], PSA, and mpMRI-PIRADS scores did not differ between the two groups. The mean difference between the LiST and sham group in the change of the NIH-CPSI pain-domain score (Q1-4) from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment which was 3.3 (95% CI, 1.8, 4.7). Perineal LiST was easy and safe to perform without anesthesia or any side-effects. Conclusions LiST seems to be a safe and effective treatment option for CP/CPPS, considerably improving pain and quality of life. Lack of any side-effects, and the potential for repetition make LiST a promising treatment choice for CP/CPPS patients.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 379
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comment on “Tadalafil monotherapy in management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized double‑blind placebo controlled clinical trial”
    Yongfeng Lao
    Yanan Bai
    Yanan Wang
    Zhilong Dong
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2585 - 2586
  • [22] LOW INTENSITY SHOCKWAVE THERAPY FOR ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION: A SHAM-CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    Goldstein, Sue W.
    Goldstein, Irwin
    Kim, Noel N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [23] Re: Low-Intensity Shockwave Therapy for the Management of Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (02): : 442 - 442
  • [24] Outcomes and clinical predictors of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Ahmed M. Sakr
    Amr M. Fawzi
    Mostafa Kamel
    Maged M. Ali
    [J]. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2022, 25 : 93 - 99
  • [25] Outcomes and clinical predictors of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Sakr, Ahmed M.
    Fawzi, Amr M.
    Kamel, Mostafa
    Ali, Maged M.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2022, 25 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [26] Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) for the management of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS)
    Kanapathy, U.
    Han, P. K.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 : 53 - 53
  • [27] Comparing two different low-intensity shockwave therapy frequency protocols for nonbacterial chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial
    Mykoniatis, Ioannis
    Pyrgidis, Nikolaos
    Kalyvianakis, Dimitrios
    Zilotis, Filimon
    Kapoteli, Paraskevi
    Fournaraki, Agrippina
    Hatzichristou, Dimitrios
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2021, 81 (09): : 499 - 507
  • [28] Terazosin therapy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A randomized, placebo controlled trial
    Cheah, PY
    Liong, ML
    Yuen, KH
    Teh, CL
    Khor, T
    Yang, JR
    Yap, HW
    Krieger, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (02): : 592 - 596
  • [29] Pelvic floor electrical stimulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A randomized, sham-controlled trial
    Dimitrakov, Jordan D.
    Dechev, Ivan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 32 - 33
  • [30] Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar surgery: a pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial
    Sorrell, Robert Gordon
    Muhlenfeld, Jamie
    Moffett, John
    Stevens, Gary
    Kesten, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 11 : 1209 - 1222