Returns to food and agricultural R&D investments in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1975-2014

被引:41
|
作者
Pardey, Philip G. [1 ]
Andrade, Robert S. [1 ]
Hurley, Terrance M. [1 ]
Rao, Xudong [2 ]
Liebenberg, Frikkie G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Wageningen UR, Business Econ, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Pretoria, Dept Agr Econ Extens & Rural Dev, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Internal rates of return; Benefit-cost ratios;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.009
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Research-enabled growth in agricultural productivity is pivotal to sub-Saharan Africa's overall economic growth prospects. Yet, investments in research and development (R&D) targeted to many national food and agricultural economies throughout Africa are fragile and faltering. To gain insight into what could be driving this trend, this article updates, summarizes and reassesses the published evidence on the returns to African agricultural R&D. Based on a compilation of 113 studies published between 1975 and 2014 spanning 25 countries, the reported internal rates of return (IRRs) to food and agricultural research conducted in or of direct consequence for sub-Saharan Africa averaged 42.3%py. In addition to the 376 IRR estimates, the corresponding 129 benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) averaged 30.1. Most (96.5%) of the returns-to-research evaluations are of publicly performed R&D, and the majority (87.6%) of the studies were published in the period 1990-2009. The large dispersion in the reported IRRs and BCRs makes it difficult to discern meaningful patterns in the evidence. Moreover, the distribution of IRRs is heavily (positively) skewed, such that the median value (35.0%py) is well below the mean, like it is for research done elsewhere in the world (mean 62.4%py; median 38.0%py). Around 78.5% of the evaluations relate to the commodity-specific consequences of agricultural research, while 5.5% report on the returns to an "all agriculture" aggregate. The weight of commodity-specific evaluation evidence is not especially congruent with the composition of agricultural production throughout Africa, nor, to the best that can be determined, the commodity orientation of public African agricultural R&D. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Agricultural needs in sub-saharan Africa: the role of biotechnology
    Ndiritu, CG
    Wafula, JS
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY IN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 1998, (21): : 49 - 60
  • [42] AGRICULTURAL POLICY AND THE ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
    HINDERINK, J
    STERKENBURG, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1985, 1 (01) : 73 - 85
  • [43] The economics of agricultural technology in semiarid sub-Saharan Africa
    Tehranian, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 1997, 35 (04): : 757 - 759
  • [44] AGRICULTURAL DIVERSIFICATION AND EXPORT PROMOTION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
    DELGADO, CL
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 1995, 20 (03) : 225 - 243
  • [45] Agricultural Productivity and Policy Changes in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Nin-Pratt, Alejandro
    Yu, Bingxin
    [J]. PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN AGRICULTURE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE, 2012, : 273 - 292
  • [46] Agricultural productivity must improve in sub-Saharan Africa
    Jayne, Thomas S.
    Sanchez, Pedro A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6546) : 1045 - 1047
  • [48] Improving Agricultural Productivity Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Akande, Olaide Rufai
    Obekpa, Hephzibah Onyeje
    Fani, Djomo-Raoul
    [J]. STUDIES ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH IN SELECTED AFRICAN COUNTRIES, 2017, : 311 - 330
  • [49] Innovation and agricultural exports: the case of sub-Saharan Africa
    Korzun, Monika
    Adekunle, Bamidele
    Filson, Glen C.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 6 (06): : 499 - 510
  • [50] Constraints to Raising Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Fuglie, Keith O.
    Rada, Nicholas E.
    [J]. PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN AGRICULTURE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE, 2012, : 237 - 271