Exporting mass destruction? The determinants of dual-use trade

被引:37
|
作者
Fuhrmann, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Dept Polit Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0022343308094324
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This study applies well-known arguments on the effect of conflict, alliances, and democracy on international trade to identify the determinants of dual-use trade. Dual-use commodities are those that can be used in weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs or in legitimate civilian applications. This article advances a theory suggesting that governments seeking to maximize the gains from dual-use trade will promote exports to countries where there are security guarantees and restrict exports to countries where security threats exist. Eight hypotheses are tested using data on licensed dual-use exports from the United States to 128 countries between 1991 and 2001. The results indicate that democracy has a positive and significant effect on dual-use exports, while WMD acquisition or pursuit does not necessarily reduce states' access to such commodities. The results vary slightly, based on how dual-use exports are measured. In conducting the first systematic analysis on the determinants of dual-use trade, this study contributes to scholarly understanding of WMD proliferation and research at the nexus of international trade and international security. In particular, it offers important prescriptions for when states are likely to transfer technology that could be used to build WMD. It also encourages further work that disaggregates trade data to examine relationships between particular types of trade and conflict, alliances, free trade agreements, and other political variables.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 652
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade Policy for Dual-Use Technology
    Blanken, Leo J.
    Lepore, Jason J.
    [J]. DEFENCE AND PEACE ECONOMICS, 2024, 35 (02) : 192 - 205
  • [2] Addressing Social Determinants of Health for Dual-Use Veterans
    Sjoberg, H.
    Liu, W.
    Ayele, R.
    Rohs, C.
    Mayberry, A.
    Battaglia, C.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 55 : 136 - 136
  • [3] A DUAL-USE DEBATE
    Schulz, William G.
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2012, 90 (08) : 34 - 37
  • [4] The Dual-Use Conundrum
    Berg, Paul
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 337 (6100) : 1273 - 1273
  • [5] European Dual-Use Trade Controls. Beyond Materiality and Borders
    Aoun, Elena
    [J]. ETUDES INTERNATIONALES, 2013, 44 (04): : 644 - 646
  • [6] MITIGATING SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH FOR DUAL-USE VETERANS: A FINAL REVIEW
    Sjoberg, Heidi
    Ayele, Roman
    Rohs, Carly
    McCreight, Marina
    Battaglia, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (SUPPL 1) : S69 - S69
  • [7] Research on dual-use technology and dual-use policies in national innovation system
    Li Xiangyang
    Lei Yanjun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES SECTION, 2007, : 205 - 211
  • [8] The dual-use dilemma
    Stowsky, J
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 13 (02) : 56 - 64
  • [9] Dual-use difficulties
    White, RH
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 13 (03) : 14 - &
  • [10] Dual-Use Regulation in the Trilogue
    Feldmann, Ulrike
    [J]. ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2020, 65 (01): : 11 - 11