Incorporating environmental co-benefits into climate policies: A regional study of the cement industry in China

被引:97
|
作者
Yang Xi [1 ]
Teng Fei [1 ]
Wang Gehua [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental damage; Co-benefit; Cement industry; Marginal abatement cost curve; Mitigation technology; FOSSIL ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; AIR-POLLUTION; ANCILLARY BENEFITS; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EXTERNAL COSTS; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; HEALTH; CARBON; MITIGATION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.040
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
We analyzed the impacts of incorporating local air quality improvement and environmental co-benefits into the climate policy and mitigation technology assessment of the cement sector in China. Local air quality can benefit from reducing greenhouse gas emissions, which consequently lowers abatement costs and strengthens the cost-effectiveness of mitigation technologies. We used a simplified approach to estimate environmental damage factors due to air pollution at the sub-national level in China. The calculated economic costs of environmental damage due to PM10, NOx, and SO2 were 7,714 $/t, 1,006 $/t, and 902 $/t, respectively. These values vary among the provinces. We found that most energy-saving technologies in the cement industry will create significant co-benefits, ranging from 3 $/t CO2 to 39 $/t CO2 at the national level; however, a tradeoff for carbon capture and storage (CCS) and energy-saving technologies also resulted with increased electricity consumption. Large spatial variations of co-benefits can be gained at the sub-national level and justify the enactment of more stringent climate policies in the wealthier regions in China. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1446 / 1453
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health co-benefits and the development of climate change mitigation policies in the European Union
    Workman, Annabelle
    Blashki, Grant
    Bowen, Kathryn J.
    Karoly, David J.
    Wiseman, John
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2019, 19 (05) : 585 - 597
  • [32] Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing
    Creutzig, Felix
    He, Dongquan
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (02) : 120 - 131
  • [33] Ozone and PM related health co-benefits of climate change policies in Mexico
    Crawford-Brown, Douglas
    Barker, Terry
    Anger, Annela
    Dessens, Olivier
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 17 : 33 - 40
  • [34] Obesity and climate change mitigation in Australia: overview and analysis of policies with co-benefits
    Lowe, Melanie
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 38 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [35] Evaluation of potential co-benefits of air pollution control and climate mitigation policies for China's electricity sector
    Wei, Xinyang
    Tong, Qing
    Magill, Iain
    Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat
    Betz, Regina
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 92
  • [36] Health co-benefits of climate action
    Haines, Andy
    [J]. LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2017, 1 (01): : E4 - E5
  • [37] Blue carbon for climate and co-benefits
    Sarah E. Lester
    [J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7 : 967 - 968
  • [38] Climate co-benefits of tiger conservation
    Lamba, Aakash
    Teo, Hoong Chen
    Sreekar, Rachakonda
    Zeng, Yiwen
    Carrasco, Luis Roman
    Koh, Lian Pin
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 7 (07) : 1104 - +
  • [39] Blue carbon for climate and co-benefits
    Lester, Sarah E.
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 7 (07) : 967 - 968
  • [40] Climate co-benefits of tiger conservation
    Aakash Lamba
    Hoong Chen Teo
    Rachakonda Sreekar
    Yiwen Zeng
    Luis Roman Carrasco
    Lian Pin Koh
    [J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7 : 1104 - 1113