Soft tissue response to zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo within-subject comparison

被引:75
|
作者
van Brakel, Ralph [1 ]
Meijer, Gert J. [2 ]
Verhoeven, Jan Willem [1 ]
Jansen, John [2 ]
de Putter, Cornelis [1 ]
Cune, Marco S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Oral Maxillofacial Surg Prosthodont & Specia, NL-3508 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Med Ctr, Dept Biomat & Periodontol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Oral Maxillofacial Surg Prosthodont & Specia, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Fixed & Removable Prosthodont, Ctr Dent & Oral Hyg, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
abutment; histology; implant; peri-implant mucosa; titanium; zirconia; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BACTERIAL-COLONIZATION; MUCOSAL ATTACHMENT; PLAQUE-FORMATION; PURE TITANIUM; OXIDE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SUPRAGINGIVAL; MICROBIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01931.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To compare the health of the soft tissues towards zirconia and titanium abutments in man, as observed using histological data. Material and Methods Twenty patients received two mandibular implants with either a zirconia or titanium abutment (split mouth study design, left-right randomization). After 3 similar to months soft tissue biopsies were prepared for histological evaluation. They were subjected to blind evaluation. The number of blood vessels per surface unit and an inflammation grading scale score ranging from 1 to 4 were determined. Results Paired samples from 17 patients were suitable for analysis, 3 with unsevered implant-abutment connections and 14 solely containing soft tissue. All showed a well-keratinized stratified squamous epithelium which was continuous with the barrier (junctional) epithelium that faced the abutment surface. The normal epithelial build-up could be recognized with little signs of inflammation. No statistically significant difference in tissues adjacent to zirconia and titanium abutment surfaces were seen with respect to vascular density (20.5 SD 4.4 and 20.7 SD 3.2) or inflammation grading scale scores (3.2 SD 0.7 versus 3.1 SD 0.7). Conclusion No differences in soft tissue health were seen in peri-implant mucosa adjacent to zirconia and titanium abutment surfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1001
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of titanium or zirconia implant abutments on epithelial attachments after ultrasonic cleaning
    Hu, Jiangqi
    Atsuta, Ikiru
    Ayukawa, Yasunori
    Zhou, Tianren
    Narimatsu, Ikue
    Koyano, Kiyoshi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2020, 62 (03) : 331 - 334
  • [32] RETRACTED: Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study (Retracted Article)
    de Oliveira, Greison Rabelo
    Pozzer, Leandro
    Cavalieri-Pereira, Lucas
    de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson
    Olate, Sergio
    de Albergaria Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2012, 42 (06): : 217 - 223
  • [33] Osteoblast and bone tissue response to surface modified zirconia and titanium implant materials
    Kohal, Ralf J.
    Baechle, Maria
    Att, Wael
    Chaar, Saad
    Altmann, Brigitte
    Renz, Alexander
    Butz, Frank
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2013, 29 (07) : 763 - 776
  • [34] A Comparison of Fabrication Precision and Mechanical Reliability of 2 Zirconia Implant Abutments
    Kerstein, Robert B.
    Radke, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2008, 23 (06) : 1029 - 1036
  • [35] An In-Vivo Comparative Study of the Soft Tissue Response and Esthetics of the Titanium Implant with Titanium Collar by Flapless and Conventional Flap Technique
    Saraswati, Sony
    Bhowmick, Devleena
    Pravin, Kumari S.
    Mahajan, Tarun
    Dubey, Richa
    Smita
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 14 : 514 - 517
  • [36] Within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses.
    Feine, JS
    Tang, L
    Tache, R
    Clokie, C
    Lund, JP
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 2804 - 2804
  • [37] WITHIN-SUBJECT COMPARISON OF MASTICATION WITH MANDIBULAR LONG-BAR AND HYBRID IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES
    TANG, L
    FEINE, JS
    TACHE, R
    LUND, JP
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 588 - 588
  • [38] Within-Subject Comparison of Word Recognition and Spiral Ganglion Cell Count in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Seyyedi, Mohammad
    Viana, Lucas M.
    Nadol, Joseph B., Jr.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (08) : 1446 - 1450
  • [39] Within-Subject Changes in Shoulder Girdle Muscle Activation After Soft Tissue Mobilization of the Upper Trapezius
    Sathe, Tanmay
    Prabhu, Anupama
    Vishal, Kavitha
    JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, 2022, 21 (03) : 149 - 156
  • [40] RITALIN VS RESPONSE COST IN THE CONTROL OF HYPERACTIVE-CHILDREN - A WITHIN-SUBJECT COMPARISON
    RAPPORT, MD
    MURPHY, HA
    BAILEY, JS
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1982, 15 (02) : 205 - 216