Lateralization of Auditory Processing of Silbo Gomero

被引:2
|
作者
Gonzalez, Pamela Villar [1 ]
Guentuerkuen, Onur [1 ]
Ocklenburg, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Cognit Neurosci, Dept Psychol, Biopsychol, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2020年 / 12卷 / 07期
关键词
Silbo Gomero; whistle language; cerebral lateralization; brain asymmetry; dichotic listening task; RIGHT-EAR ADVANTAGE; LANGUAGE LATERALIZATION; LEFT-HEMISPHERE; SIGN-LANGUAGE; SPEECH; BRAIN; ASYMMETRIES; PERCEPTION; HANDEDNESS; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3390/sym12071183
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Left-hemispheric language dominance is a well-known characteristic of the human language system. However, it has been shown that leftward language lateralization decreases dramatically when people communicate using whistles. Whistled languages present a transformation of a spoken language into whistles, facilitating communication over great distances. In order to investigate the laterality of Silbo Gomero, a form of whistled Spanish, we used a vocal and a whistled dichotic listening task in a sample of 75 healthy Spanish speakers. Both individuals that were able to whistle and to understand Silbo Gomero and a non-whistling control group showed a clear right-ear advantage for vocal dichotic listening. For whistled dichotic listening, the control group did not show any hemispheric asymmetries. In contrast, the whistlers' group showed a right-ear advantage for whistled stimuli. This right-ear advantage was, however, smaller compared to the right-ear advantage found for vocal dichotic listening. In line with a previous study on language lateralization of whistled Turkish, these findings suggest that whistled language processing is associated with a decrease in left and a relative increase in right hemispheric processing. This shows that bihemispheric processing of whistled language stimuli occurs independent of language.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Auditory Lateralization Training Effects on Binaural Interaction Component of Middle Latency Response in Children Suspected to Central Auditory Processing Disorder
    Lotfi, Yones
    Moosavi, Abdollah
    Abdollahi, Farzaneh Zamiri
    Bakhshi, Enayatollah
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2019, 71 (01) : 104 - 108
  • [32] HEARING-LOSS AND AUDITORY LATERALIZATION
    MELNICK, W
    BILGER, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1965, 8 (01): : 3 - 12
  • [33] Hemispheric lateralization for early auditory processing of lexical tones: Dependence on pitch level and pitch contour
    Wang, Xiao-Dong
    Wang, Ming
    Chen, Lin
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2013, 51 (11) : 2238 - 2244
  • [34] The influence of visual information on auditory lateralization
    Saetrevik, Bjorn
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 51 (04) : 290 - 293
  • [35] Effect of adaptation on auditory localization and lateralization
    Canevet, G
    Meunier, S
    [J]. ACUSTICA, 1996, 82 (01): : 149 - 157
  • [36] LATERALIZATION PHENOMENON OF COMPLEX AUDITORY HALLUCINATIONS
    TANABE, H
    SAWADA, T
    ASAI, H
    OKUDA, J
    SHIRAISHI, J
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 74 (02) : 178 - 182
  • [37] Binaural sensitivity to temporal fine structure and lateralization ability in children with suspected (central) auditory processing disorder
    Lotfi, Yones
    Ahmadi, Tayebeh
    Moossavi, Abdollah
    Bakhshi, Enayatollah
    [J]. AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2019, 46 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [38] Hemispheric lateralization at different levels of human auditory word processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
    Zahn, R
    Huber, W
    Drews, E
    Erberich, S
    Krings, T
    Willmes, K
    Schwarz, M
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2000, 287 (03) : 195 - 198
  • [39] ROLE OF THE THALAMUS IN AUDITORY LATERALIZATION - HISTOLOGIC DATA
    GALABURDA, AM
    [J]. REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 1986, 142 (04) : 441 - 444
  • [40] AUDITORY LATERALIZATION AND PLANUM-TEMPORALE ASYMMETRY
    JANCKE, L
    STEINMETZ, H
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 1993, 5 (02) : 169 - 172