IS VII > IX?: DOES TITLE VII PREEMPT TITLE IX SEX DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS IN HIGHER ED EMPLOYMENT?

被引：0

作者：

Miller, McKenzie ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Catholic Univ Amer, Columbus Sch Law, Washington, DC 20064 USA

来源：

CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 2019年 / 68卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：401 / 424

页数：24

共 50 条

[41] SEX, PROMOTIONS, AND TITLE-VII - WHY SEXUAL FAVORITISM IS NOT SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION
LEVY, MJ
[J]. HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL, 1994, 45 (03) : 667 - 696
[42] SEX-DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE-VII AND CONSTITUTION - LEGAL ANALYSIS
HILL, M
[J]. LABOR LAW JOURNAL, 1978, 29 (09) : 570 - 581
[43] EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT - TITLE VII AMENDED AND SECTION 1983 REVISITED
SCHULMAN, A
[J]. LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW, 1974, 34 (03): : 540 - 551
[44] EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION AND FCN TREATIES - ARE FOREIGN COMPANIES EXEMPT FROM TITLE-VII
BRASWELL, MK
POE, SL
[J]. LABOR LAW JOURNAL, 1993, 44 (12) : 727 - 741
[45] CLASS ACTIONS AND EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE VII OF CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
MILLER, PO
[J]. MISSISSIPPI LAW JOURNAL, 1972, 43 (03): : 275 - 286
[46] THE AFTER-ACQUIRED EVIDENCE DEFENSE TO EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS - THE PRIVATIZATION OF TITLE-VII AND THE CONTOURS OF SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY
ZEMELMAN, CK
[J]. STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1993, 46 (01) : 175 - 211
[47] THE REALITY OF MATERIALITY: WHY A HEIGHTENED ADVERSITY STANDARD HAS NO PLACE IN TITLE VII DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS
McCabe, Abigail
[J]. FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2023, 91 (04) : 1485 - 1519
[48] SEX-DISCRIMINATION 101 - DEVELOPING A TITLE IX ANALYSIS FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN EDUCATION
ROTH, SH
[J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & EDUCATION, 1994, 23 (04): : 459 - 521
[49] SEX-DISCRIMINATION AND INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS - PUTTING SOME MUSCLE ON TITLE-IX
不详
[J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1979, 88 (06): : 1254 - 1279
[50] Title VII's Statutory History and the Sex Discrimination Argument for LGBT Workplace Protections
Eskridge, William N., Jr.
[J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 2017, 127 (02): : 322 - 404

← 1 2 3 4 5 →

IS VII &gt; IX?: DOES TITLE VII PREEMPT TITLE IX SEX DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS IN HIGHER ED EMPLOYMENT?

IS VII > IX?: DOES TITLE VII PREEMPT TITLE IX SEX DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS IN HIGHER ED EMPLOYMENT?