UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (UroVysion FISH) assay for detection of bladder cancer in voided urine of Turkish patients: a preliminary study

被引:4
|
作者
Dodurga, Yavuz [1 ]
Avci, Cigir Biray [2 ]
Yilmaz, Sunde [2 ]
Nazli, Oktay [3 ]
Cogulu, Ozgur [4 ]
Cankaya, Tufan [5 ]
Gunduz, Cumhur [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Biol, Denizli, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Biol, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Izmir, Turkey
[4] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Genet, Izmir, Turkey
[5] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Genet, Izmir, Turkey
来源
WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY | 2013年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
UroVysion FISH; bladder cancer; voided urine; cytology; TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA; UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; CYTOLOGY; MULTITARGET; SURVEILLANCE; UTILITY;
D O I
10.5114/wo.2013.34619
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men and the fifth most common cancer worldwide. UroVysion FISH has high sensitivity and specificity for urothelial carcinoma detection. We investigated the genetic marker detected by the UroVysion FISH technique in diagnosis of Turkish bladder cancer patients and compared these results with the urine cytology and cystoscopy. Urine specimens were analyzed using UroVysion FISH probes for abnormalities in centromeric chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and locus-specific 9p21. Morning fresh voided urine samples were collected from each patient for FISH analysis. Cytology and histopathology analysis were performed by the pathology department. Twenty-seven bladder cancer patients (23 male and 4 female) with a history of bladder cancer who provided informed consent were included in this prospective study. The results showed that cancer was detected in 8 patients via FISH; 7 via cytology; 12 via cystoscopy. According to the pathology results, 15 were normal, 10 high-grade carcinoma and 2 low-grade carcinoma. Sensitivity of these methods with FISH, cytology, and cystoscopy was 29.6%, 25.9%, and 44.4%, respectively. In conclusion, all tests have different advantages and disadvantages. Also, larger studies will be needed to confirm these results. But, UroVysion FISH appeared to have good specificity for detecting bladder cancer in urine specimens and also it is important to correlate the FISH results with the cystoscopy and cytological findings.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 160
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The use of Urovysion™ fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis and surveillance of non-urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
    Reid-Nicholson, Michelle D.
    Ramalingam, Preetha
    Adeagbo, Bamidele
    Cheng, Ningli
    Peiper, Stephen C.
    Terris, Martha K.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [22] A study of the reproducibility of a fluorescence in situ hybridization bladder cancer detection assay
    Brankley, Shannon M.
    Adams, Elizabeth J.
    Christensen, Michael R.
    Everts, Cortney R.
    Lund, Jennifer D.
    Oberg, Trynda N.
    Plagge, Amy M.
    Zieman, Angela H.
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Halling, Kevin C.
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 2008, 30 (03): : 145 - 151
  • [23] MULTICENTER EVALUATION OF THE ROLE OF UROVYSION FISH ASSAY IN SURVEILLANCE OF PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER: DOES FISH POSITIVITY ANTICIPATE RECURRENCE?
    Seideman, Casey
    Canter, Daniel
    Kim, Phillip
    Cordon, Billy
    Weizer, Alon
    Oliva, Irma
    Rao, Jianyu
    Inman, Brant
    Posch, Michael
    Lakowske, Margaret
    Herr, Harry
    Lotan, Yair
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E158 - E159
  • [24] Multicenter evaluation of the role of UroVysion FISH assay in surveillance of patients with bladder cancer: does FISH positivity anticipate recurrence?
    Seideman, Casey
    Canter, Daniel
    Kim, Philip
    Cordon, Billy
    Weizer, Alon
    Oliva, Irma
    Rao, Jianyu
    Inman, Brant A.
    Posch, Michael
    Herr, Harry
    Lotan, Yair
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (09) : 1309 - 1313
  • [25] Noninvasive detection and prediction of bladder cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of exfoliated urothelial cells in voided urine
    Ishiwata, S
    Takahashi, S
    Homma, Y
    Tanaka, Y
    Kameyama, S
    Hosaka, Y
    Kitamura, T
    UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (04) : 811 - 815
  • [26] Development and Initial Testing of a Modified UroVysion-Based Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Score for Prediction of Progression in Bladder Cancer
    Kocsmar, Ildiko
    Pajor, Gabor
    Gyongyosi, Benedek
    Szekely, Eszter
    Varga, Marton
    Kocsmar, Eva
    Kenessey, Istvan
    Beethe, Tamas
    Sule, Norbert
    Majoros, Attila
    Szendroi, Attila
    Nyirady, Peter
    Kiss, Andras
    Riesz, Peter
    Lotz, Gabor
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2020, 153 (02) : 274 - 284
  • [27] Multicenter evaluation of the role of UroVysion FISH assay in surveillance of patients with bladder cancer: does FISH positivity anticipate recurrence?
    Casey Seideman
    Daniel Canter
    Philip Kim
    Billy Cordon
    Alon Weizer
    Irma Oliva
    Jianyu Rao
    Brant A. Inman
    Michael Posch
    Harry Herr
    Yair Lotan
    World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 1309 - 1313
  • [28] Combined morphologic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of voided urine samples for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer in patients with benign urine cytology
    Daniely, Michal
    Rona, Roni
    Kaplan, Tal
    Olsfanger, Shirley
    Elboim, Lea
    Freiberger, Avner
    Lew, Sylvia
    Leibovitch, Ilan
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2007, 111 (06) : 517 - 524
  • [29] Combined analysis of morphology and fluorescence in situ hybridization significantly increases accuracy of bladder cancer detection in voided urine samples
    Daniely, M
    Rona, R
    Kaplan, T
    Olsfanger, S
    Elboim, L
    Zilberstien, Y
    Friberger, A
    Kidron, D
    Kaplan, E
    Lew, S
    Leibovitch, A
    UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (06) : 1354 - 1359
  • [30] Re: Multicenter Evaluation of the Role of UroVysion FISH Assay in Surveillance of Patients with Bladder Cancer: Does FISH Positivity Anticipate Recurrence?
    Chang, Sam S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : 1003 - +