Scaling up biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships across space and over time

被引:33
|
作者
Qiu, Jiangxiao [1 ]
Cardinale, Bradley J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Ft Lauderdale Res & Educ Ctr, Sch Forest Resources & Conservat, Davie, FL 33314 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Cooperat Inst Great Lakes Res, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BEF; ecosystem production; ecosystem service; landscape management; plant diversity; productivity; scaling function; spatial scale; temporal scale; PLANT DIVERSITY; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; PRODUCTIVITY; SERVICES; IMPACTS; HETEROGENEITY; CONSEQUENCES; METAANALYSIS; INCREASE; LINKING;
D O I
10.1002/ecy.3166
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding how to scale up effects of biological diversity on ecosystem functioning and services remains challenging. There is a general consensus that biodiversity loss alters ecosystem processes underpinning the goods and services upon which humanity depends. Yet most of that consensus stems from experiments performed at small spatial scales for short time frames, which limits transferability of conclusions to longer-term, landscape-scale conservation policies and management. Here we develop quantitative scaling relationships linking 374 experiments that tested plant diversity effects on biomass production across a range of scales. We show that biodiversity effects increase by factors of 1.68 and 1.10 for each 10-fold increase in experiment temporal and spatial scales, respectively. Contrary to prior studies, our analyses suggest that the time scale of experiments, rather than their spatial scale, is the primary source of variation in biodiversity effects. But consistent with earlier research, our analyses reveal that complementarity effects, rather than selection effects, drive the positive space-time interactions for plant diversity effects. Importantly, we also demonstrate complex space-time interactions and nonlinear responses that emphasize how simple extrapolations from small-scale experiments are likely to underestimate biodiversity effects in real-world ecosystems. Quantitative scaling relationships from this research are a crucial step towards bridging controlled experiments that identify biological mechanisms across a range of scales. Predictions from scaling relationships like these could then be compared with observations for fine-tuning the relationships and ultimately improving their capacities to predict consequences of biodiversity loss for ecosystem functioning and services over longer time frames across real-world landscapes.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Phylogenetically-conserved candidate genes unify biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships and eco-evolutionary dynamics across biological scales
    Blanchet, Simon
    Fargeot, Laura
    Raffard, Allan
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2023, 32 (16) : 4467 - 4481
  • [32] The strength of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship depends on spatial scale
    Thompson, Patrick L.
    Isbell, Forest
    Loreau, Michel
    O'Connor, Mary I.
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 285 (1880)
  • [33] Seafloor heterogeneity influences the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in the deep sea
    Zeppilli, Daniela
    Pusceddu, Antonio
    Trincardi, Fabio
    Danovaro, Roberto
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [34] Effects of disturbance on macrofaunal biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in seagrass habitats
    Colvin, T. J.
    Snelgrove, P. V. R.
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY-AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE, 2023, 44 (04):
  • [35] Modern causal inference approaches to investigate biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships
    Runge, Jakob
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [36] BIODIVERSITY-ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION RESEARCH: INSIGHTS GAINED FROM STREAMS
    Lecerf, A.
    Richardson, J. S.
    [J]. RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 26 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [37] Does Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Literature Neglect Tropical Ecosystems?
    Clarke, David A.
    York, Paul H.
    Rasheed, Michael A.
    Northfield, Tobin D.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 32 (05) : 320 - 323
  • [38] Variation in the methods leads to variation in the interpretation of biodiversity-ecosystem multifunctionality relationships
    Jing, Xin
    Prager, Case M.
    Classen, Aimee T.
    Maestre, Fernando T.
    He, Jin-Sheng
    Sanders, Nathan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT ECOLOGY, 2020, 13 (04) : 431 - 441
  • [39] Functional diversity and secondary production of macrofaunal assemblages can provide insights of biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships
    Zhe Wang
    Jing Xu
    Zhaodong Xu
    Xiaoshou Liu
    [J]. Environmental Sciences Europe, 36
  • [40] Biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship in microphytobenthic diatoms of the Westerschelde estuary
    Forster, R. M.
    Creach, V.
    Sabbe, K.
    Vyverman, W.
    Stal, L. J.
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2006, 311 : 191 - 201