Potential co-benefits of electrification for air quality, health, and CO2 mitigation in 2030 China

被引:98
|
作者
Peng, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Junnan [1 ]
Lu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Mauzerall, Denise L. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Sci Technol & Environm Policy program, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Belfer Ctr Sci & Int Affairs, Environm & Nat Resources Program, JF Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Princeton Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
End-use electrification; Air pollution; Co-benefits; Carbon emissions; China; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; CEMENT INDUSTRY; POWER-SYSTEM; WIND POWER; EMISSIONS; EXPOSURE; MODEL; COOKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.048
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Electrification with decarbonized electricity is a central strategy for carbon mitigation. End-use electrification can also reduce air pollutant emissions from the demand sectors, which brings public health co-benefits. Here we focus on electrification strategies for China, a country committed to both reducing air pollution and peaking carbon emissions before 2030. Considering both coal-intensive and decarbonized power system scenarios for 2030, we assess the air quality, health and climate co-benefits of various end-use electrification scenarios for the vehicle and residential sectors relative to a non-electrified coal-intensive business-as-usual scenario (BAU). Based on an integrated assessment using the regional air pollution model WRF-Chem and epidemiological concentration-response relationships, we find that coal-intensive electrification (75% coal) does not reduce carbon emissions, but can bring significant air quality and health benefits (41,000-57,000 avoided deaths in China annually). In comparison, switching to a half decarbonized power supply (similar to 50% coal) for electrification of the transport and/or residential sectors leads to a 14-16% reduction in carbon emissions compared to BAU, as well as greater air quality and health co-benefits (55,000-69,000 avoided deaths in China annually) than coal intensive electrification. Furthermore, depending on which end-use sector is electrified, we find different regional distributions of air quality and health benefits. While electrifying the transport sector improves air quality throughout eastern China, electrifying the residential sector brings most benefits to the North China Plain region in winter where coal-based heating contributes substantially to air pollution.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 519
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Air quality co-benefits of subnational carbon policies
    Thompson, Tammy M.
    Rausch, Sebastian
    Saari, Rebecca K.
    Selin, Noelle E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2016, 66 (10) : 988 - 1002
  • [42] Co-Benefits of CO2 and NOx Emission Control in China's Cement Industry
    FENG Xiangzhao
    Oleg LUGOVOY
    YAN Sheng
    QIN Hu
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 2016, 4 (04) : 106 - 125
  • [43] Co-Benefits of CO2 and NOx Emission Control in China's Cement Industry
    Feng Xiangzhao
    Lugovoy, Oleg
    Yan Sheng
    Qin Hu
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2016, 4 (04)
  • [44] Electrification of the economy and CO2 emissions mitigation
    Edmonds J.
    Wilson T.
    Wise M.
    Weyant J.
    [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2006, 7 (3) : 175 - 203
  • [45] Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study
    Markandya, Anil
    Sampedro, Jon
    Smith, Steven J.
    Van Dingenen, Rita
    Pizarro-Irizar, Cristina
    Arto, Inaki
    Gonzalez-Eguino, Mikel
    [J]. LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2018, 2 (03): : E126 - E133
  • [46] Co-benefits of CO2 emission reduction in a developing country
    Shrestha, Ram M.
    Pradhan, Shreekar
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (05) : 2586 - 2597
  • [47] Urban cross-sector actions for carbon mitigation with local health co-benefits in China
    Anu Ramaswami
    Kangkang Tong
    Andrew Fang
    Raj M. Lal
    Ajay Singh Nagpure
    Yang Li
    Huajun Yu
    Daqian Jiang
    Armistead G. Russell
    Lei Shi
    Marian Chertow
    Yangjun Wang
    Shuxiao Wang
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7 : 736 - 742
  • [48] Urban cross-sector actions for carbon mitigation with local health co-benefits in China
    Ramaswami, Anu
    Tong, Kangkang
    Fang, Andrew
    Lal, Raj M.
    Nagpure, Ajay Singh
    Li, Yang
    Yu, Huajun
    Jiang, Daqian
    Russell, Armistead G.
    Shi, Lei
    Chertow, Marian
    Wang, Yangjun
    Wang, Shuxiao
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 7 (10) : 736 - +
  • [49] Large-scale renewable energy brings regionally disproportional air quality and health co-benefits in China
    Xie, Yang
    Xu, Meng
    Pu, Jinlu
    Pan, Yujie
    Liu, Xiaorui
    Zhang, Yanxu
    Xu, Shasha
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (08)
  • [50] The implications of initiating immediate climate change mitigation - A potential for co-benefits?
    Schwanitz, Valeria Jana
    Longden, Thomas
    Knopf, Brigitte
    Capros, Pantelis
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 : 166 - 177