Comparison of planned caesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery in women with a twin pregnancy: A nation wide cohort study

被引:14
|
作者
Goossens, Simone M. T. A. [1 ,2 ]
Ensing, Sabine [3 ]
van der Hoeven, Mark A. H. B. M. [4 ]
Roumen, Frans J. M. E. [5 ]
Nijhuis, Jan G. [6 ]
Mol, Ben W. [7 ]
机构
[1] Maxima Med Ctr Veldhoven, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, POB 7777, NL-5500 MB Veldhoven, Netherlands
[2] GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neonatol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Zuyderland Med Ctr Heerlen Sittard, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Geleen, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Adelaide, Sch Pediat & Reprod Hlth, Robinson Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Twin pregnancy; Delivery method; Caesarean section; Vaginal delivery; Neonatal outcomes; PROBABILISTIC RECORD LINKAGE; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY; MODE; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.018
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare, in women with twin pregnancy with the first twin in cephalic position, neonatal morbidity and mortality rates after planned caesarean delivery (CD) versus planned vaginal delivery (VD). Study Design: A nationwide cohort study on women pregnant with twins and the first child in cephalic position, who delivered between 32 + 0-41 + 0 weeks between 2000 and 2012 in the Netherlands, using multivariate logistic regression analysis to compare neonatal morbidity and mortality according to planned delivery mode, and looking at subgroups 32 + 0-36 + 6 and 37 + 0-41 +0 weeks. Results: We included 21,107 women, of whom 1384 (6.6%) had a planned CD. Of the 19,723 women (93.4%) who had a planned VD, 19.7% delivered by intrapartum CD. We found no significant differences in 'any mortality' (aOR planned CD vs. planned VD 1.34 (95% CI 0.63-2.60)), the outcome 'Apgar score (AS) < 4 or death within 28 days' (aOR 1.28 (95% CI 0.77-2.11) or asphyxia-related morbidity (aOR 0.57 (95% CI 0.32-1.03)). After planned CD more prematurity -related morbidity (aOR 1.55 (95% CI 1.21-1.98)), other morbidity (aOR 1.50 (95% CI 1.26-1.78)) and 'any morbidity or mortality' (aOR 1.41 (95% CI 1.20-1.66) was noted. Trauma-associated morbidity was absent after planned CD and occurred 45 times (0.2%) after planned VD. Before 36 + 6 weeks, planned CD resulted in more perinatal mortality (aOR 2.10 (95% CI 0.92-4.76)), while asphyxia -related morbidity did not differ (aOR 0.80 (95% CI 0.41-1.54). Planned CD resulted in more 'any morbidity or mortality' (aOR 1.52 (95% CI 1.25-1.84)), 'AS < 4 or death within 28 days' (aOR 1.77 (95% CI 1.02-3.09)), prematurity -related morbidity (aOR 1.73 (95% CI 1.34-2.23)), and 'other morbidity' (aOR 1.56 (95% CI 1.28-1.90)). After 37 weeks, no significance differences in mortality, 'any morbidity or mortality <28 days' (aOR 0.96 (95% CI 1 (0.67-1.38)), or 'AS < 4 or death within 28 days' (aOR 0.41 (95% CI (0.10-1.70)) were found. There was less asphyxia -related morbidity after planned CD (aOR 0.24 (95% Cl 0.06-1.002)). Conclusion: Planned VD results in comparable neonatal outcomes as planned CD for twin pregnancy with the first twin in cephalic position, even with a low intrapartum CD rate of 19.7%. At term, a planned CD may result in less asphyxia- and trauma -related outcomes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vaginal delivery in twin pregnancies: planned expectations versus outcomes
    Mobayen, R.
    Attilakos, G.
    Wimalasundera, R.
    Whitten, M.
    Hillman, S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 140 - 140
  • [22] Twin birth - planned vaginal delivery still standard of care
    Norman, Mikael
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2017, 106 (06) : 1012 - 1012
  • [23] Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study
    Maria Jonsson
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15
  • [24] Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study
    Jonsson, Maria
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [25] Fetomaternal outcome of breech vaginal delivery versus planned caesarean section
    Munwar, Raheela
    Rajpar, Sajida
    Memon, Fareen
    Bilquees, Miss
    Shoukat, Razia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 22
  • [26] Planned caesarean section or trial of vaginal delivery? A meta-analysis
    Azam, Sultana
    Khanam, Amina
    Tirlapur, Seema
    Khan, Khalid
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 26 (06) : 461 - 468
  • [27] Risk factors for emergency caesarean section in planned vaginal breech delivery
    Parissenti, Tamara K.
    Hebisch, Gundula
    Sell, Wieland
    Staedele, Patricia E.
    Viereck, Volker
    Fehr, Mathias K.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [28] Risk factors for emergency caesarean section in planned vaginal breech delivery
    Tamara K. Parissenti
    Gundula Hebisch
    Wieland Sell
    Patricia E. Staedele
    Volker Viereck
    Mathias K. Fehr
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017, 295 : 51 - 58
  • [29] Twin birth study: 2-year follow-up of the randomized trial comparing planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy
    Asztalos, Elizabeth
    Hannah, Mary
    Hutton, Eileen
    Willan, Andrew
    Allen, Alexander
    Armson, Anthony
    Gafni, Amiram
    Joseph, K. S.
    Ohlsson, Arne
    Ross, Susan
    Barrett, Jon
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S18 - S18
  • [30] Unscheduled admissions in women with prior caesarean birth and planned for delivery by elective caesarean
    Suchetha, M.
    Jameison, R.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 : 107 - 108