Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science, part II: How to strike the balance

被引：6
|
作者：
Rowbottom, Darrell P. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Lingnan Univ, Dept Philosophy, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源：
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE | 2013年 / 44卷 / 02期
关键词：
DIVISION;
D O I：
10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.11.011
中图分类号：
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要：
This paper is a supplement to, and provides a proof of principle of, Kuhn vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level. It illustrates how calculations may be performed in order to determine how the balance between different functions in science such as imaginative, critical, and dogmatic should be struck, with respect to confirmation (or corroboration) functions and rules of scientific method. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：161 / 168
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
12345