Statistics of ash dieback in Latvia

被引:11
|
作者
Matisone, I [1 ]
Matisons, R. [1 ]
Laivins, M. [1 ]
Gaitnieks, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Latvian State Forest Res Inst LSFRI Silava, Rigas Str 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
关键词
Fraxinus excelsior; mortality rate; national forest inventory; permanent sampling plots; FRAXINUS-EXCELSIOR; GENETIC-VARIATION;
D O I
10.14214/sf.9901
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Dieback of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) has been spreading throughout Europe since the 1990s, causing severe ecological and economical consequences; however, detailed statistics on its dynamics have been published rarely. This paper presents the dynamics of mature ash-dominated stands in Latvia for the period 2005-2015. Data from the national forest inventory and a permanent sampling plot network were summarised. According to the official statistics, the dieback has caused a twofold decrease in area of the ash stands (from 21891 to 13011 ha, which respectively comprised ca. 0.8 to ca. 0.4% of the total forest area). The official statistics on standing volume appeared biased, as they did not account for increased mortality. According to the permanent sampling plots, standing volume and stand density have been affected even more, having decreased by 53.1 and 69.9%, respectively, compared to 2005 (the stand density and standing volume of ash in 2015 was 77 individuals ha(-1) and 151 m(3) ha(-1), respectively). The mortality of the trees has not been stable. Stand density decreased faster during 2005-2009 compared to 2010-2015, with mortality rates of 9.6 and 8.2% year(-1), respectively. In contrast, the decrease in standing volume in 2005-2009 was slower than in 2010-2015 (mortality rates were 4.7 and 7.7% year(-1), respectively) because trees with smaller dimensions were more susceptible to the dieback. Nevertheless, the observed mortality rates clearly indicate negative prospects for ash stands in Latvia.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FraxForFuture—research on European ash dieback in Germany
    Gitta Jutta Langer
    Sebastian Fuchs
    Johannes Osewold
    Sandra Peters
    Falk Schrewe
    Maia Ridley
    Ralf Kätzel
    Ben Bubner
    Jörg Grüner
    [J]. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2022, 129 : 1285 - 1295
  • [22] High cost of UK's ash dieback
    Vaughan, Adam
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2019, 242 (3229) : 7 - 7
  • [23] The £15 billion cost of ash dieback in Britain
    Hill, Louise
    Jones, Glyn
    Atkinson, Nick
    Hector, Andy
    Hemery, Gabriel
    Brown, Nick
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) : R315 - R316
  • [24] Lichens under threat from ash dieback
    Ellis, Christopher J.
    Coppins, Brian J.
    Hollingsworth, Peter M.
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 491 (7426) : 672 - 672
  • [25] Effects of endophytic fungi on the ash dieback pathogen
    Schlegel, Markus
    Dubach, Vivanne
    von Buol, Larissa
    Sieber, Thomas N.
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2016, 92 (09)
  • [26] Lichens under threat from ash dieback
    Christopher J. Ellis
    Brian J. Coppins
    Peter M. Hollingsworth
    [J]. Nature, 2012, 491 : 672 - 672
  • [27] Understory changes in mixed elm stands in response to canopy dieback in Latvia
    Matisone, Ilze
    Kaupe, Darta
    Matisons, Roberts
    Klavina, Darta
    Jansons, Aris
    [J]. BALTIC FORESTRY, 2023, 29 (02) : 113 - 122
  • [28] Common Ash Stand Affected by Ash Dieback in the Wolica Nature Reserve in Poland
    Pacia, Artur
    Nowakowska, Justyna A.
    Tkaczyk, Milosz
    Sikora, Katarzyna
    Tereba, Anna
    Borys, Malgorzata
    Milenkovic, Ivan
    Pszczolkowska, Agnieszka
    Okorski, Adam
    Oszako, Tomasz
    [J]. BALTIC FORESTRY, 2017, 23 (01) : 183 - 197
  • [29] Role of leaf microbiome associated with European ash in mediating resistance to ash dieback
    Cleary, M.
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 107 (12) : 149 - 149
  • [30] Invertebrate species at risk from Ash Dieback in the UK
    Littlewood, Nick A.
    Nau, Bernard S.
    Pozsgai, Gabor
    Stockan, Jenni A.
    Stubbs, Alan
    Young, Mark R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2015, 19 (01) : 75 - 85