Gleason 4+3 Versus Gleason 3+4 Prostate Cancer: Still A Worse Prognostic Indicator Despite the Introduction of RAPC

被引:0
|
作者
Broe, M. [1 ]
Forde, J. [1 ]
Burke, M. [1 ]
Shakeel, I. [1 ]
Lennon, G. [1 ]
Galvin, D. [1 ]
Mulvin, D. [1 ]
Quinlan, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
2
引用
收藏
页码:S384 / S384
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance Imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3+4
    Kim, Hwanik
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Ye, Changhee
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 64 - 65
  • [42] Increasing trend of utilising active surveillance for Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer
    Bernardino, Rui
    Sayyid, Rashid K.
    Leao, Ricardo
    Zlotta, Alexandre R.
    van Der Kwast, Theodorus
    Klotz, Laurence
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (06) : 638 - 640
  • [43] Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer with Minimal Quantity of Gleason Pattern 4 on Needle Biopsy Is Often Associated with Low Risk Tumor
    Deng, F-M
    Huang, C. C.
    Kong, M.
    Xu, X.
    Zhou, M.
    Melamed, J.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 : 224A - 224A
  • [44] Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer with Minimal Quantity of Gleason Pattern 4 on Needle Biopsy Is Often Associated with Low Risk Tumor
    Deng, F-M
    Huang, C. C.
    Kong, M.
    Xu, W.
    Zhou, M.
    Melamed, J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2014, 94 : 224A - 224A
  • [45] Comparative Study of Gleason 7 (3+4) and (4+3) Prostatic Adenocarcinomas with Prognostic Criteria and Immunohistochemical Profiles of AMACR, PSA and Ki-67
    Osorio, Clarice F. E. M.
    Costa, Waldemar S.
    Gallo, Carla B. M.
    Favorito, Luciano A.
    Sampaio, Francisco J. B.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2025, 51 (01):
  • [46] Concordance of T and Gleason staging in Prostate Biopsies (Gleason 3+4 with <10% pattern 4) with Matched Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Cutforth, Iona
    Haider, Aiman
    Sah, Nilay
    Freeman, Alex
    Dickinson, Louise
    Giganti, Francesco
    Lamb, Benjamin W.
    Woernle, Alex
    Mitra, Anita
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2024, 264 : S36 - S36
  • [47] Outcomes of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens
    Kir, Gozde
    Seneldir, Hatice
    Gumus, Eyup
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2016, 20 : 48 - 51
  • [48] Outcome of Gleason 3+5=8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4+4=8
    Harding-Jackson, Nicholas
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
    Whittington, Elizabeth E.
    Eastwood, Daniel C.
    Tjionas, George A.
    Jorda, Merce
    Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (04): : 1076 - 1081
  • [49] SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF MEN WITH LOCALIZED GLEASON 3+4 PROSTATE CANCER ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IN AN AUSTRALIAN POPULATION
    Kalapara, Arveen
    Landau, Adam
    Fahey, Michael
    Ischia, Joseph
    Frydenberg, Mark
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E208 - E208
  • [50] Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort
    Wong, Lih-Ming
    Tang, Vincent
    Peters, Justin
    Costello, Anthony
    Corcoran, Niall
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 82 - 87