Risk Assessment of Wastewater Collection Lines Using Failure Models and Criticality Ratings

被引:45
|
作者
Salman, Baris [1 ]
Salem, Ossama [2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Yabroudi Chair Sustainable Civil Infrastruct, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
Infrastructure; Wastewater management; Sewers; Risk assessment; Weighted scoring; Risk matrix; Fuzzy sets; EXPERT-SYSTEM; FUZZY; INFRASTRUCTURE; INSPECTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000100
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Because of deteriorating condition levels of wastewater networks and financial constraints, sewer agencies are seeking methods to prioritize inspection of sewer pipes on the basis of risk of failure. Risk assessment of sewer pipes requires integration of the probability and consequences-of-failure values in a way that reflects the decision maker's perception of risk. This paper presents the use of a weighted scoring method to determine criticality of sewer pipelines. The procedure involves identifying important factors, determining the relative importance of the selected factors, and summarizing the overall performance of sewer pipes in terms of these factors. Determination of risk of failure by combining the resultant consequence-of-failure values with the probability-of-failure values using simple multiplication, risk matrices, and fuzzy inference systems is presented. Application of these methods is illustrated by using the sewer network information obtained from a local wastewater agency. The resultant risk maps are expected to assist agency officials in identifying sewer-pipe sections that require immediate attention or close monitoring, along with sewer-pipe sections with lower risk of failure. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Failure Risk Assessment of Surge Arrester Using Paralleled Spark Gap
    Sabiha, Nehmdoh A.
    Mahmood, Farhan
    Abd-Elhady, Amr M.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 217098 - 217107
  • [42] Prospective risk assessment for gentamicin using failure modes and effects analysis
    Collignon, U.
    McRobbie, D.
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2008, 30 (06): : 1028 - 1029
  • [43] Assessment of risk propagation in an e-waste collection system using Bayesian networks
    Singh, Shailender
    Yadav, Vinod
    Routroy, Srikanta
    Dasgupta, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [44] Assessment of anaerobic wastewater treatment failure using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis
    Scully, C
    Collins, G
    O'Flaherty, V
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (06) : 1463 - 1471
  • [45] Fire Risk Assessment Models Using Statistical Machine Learning and Optimized Risk Indexing
    Choi, Myoung-Young
    Jun, Sunghae
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [46] Corrosion threat assessment of crude oil flow lines using Bayesian network models
    Koch, G.
    Ayello, F.
    Khare, V.
    Sridhar, N.
    Moosavi, A.
    CORROSION ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 50 (03) : 236 - 247
  • [47] Lightning Failure Risk Assessment of Overhead Transmission Lines Based on Modified Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Liu, Jie
    Jia, Boyan
    Zhang, Zhimeng
    Wang, Zimo
    Wang, Ping
    Geng, Jianghai
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [48] Risk assessment of wastewater contaminated with radionuclides using Arabidopsis Thaliana L. plants
    Rashydov, Narnik M.
    Berezhna, Valentina V.
    Kutsokon, Nataliya K.
    WASTEWATER REUSED - RISK ASSESSMENT, DECISION-MAKING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY, 2007, : 121 - +
  • [49] Removal of pharmaceuticals during wastewater treatment and environmental risk assessment using hazard indexes
    Gros, Meritxell
    Petrovic, Mira
    Ginebreda, Antoni
    Barcelo, Damia
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 36 (01) : 15 - 26
  • [50] Promoting mitigation in existing building populations using risk assessment models
    Young, Michael
    Cleary, Kay
    Ricker, Bob
    Taylor, Joel
    Vaziri, Pantea
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2012, 104 : 285 - 292