A meta-analysis of the effect of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant versus intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular edema

被引:82
|
作者
He, Ye [1 ]
Ren, Xin-jun [1 ]
Hu, Bo-jie [1 ]
Lam, Wai-Ching [2 ]
Li, Xiao-rong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Dept Retina, Eye Hosp, 251 Fukang Rd, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Ophthalmol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Diabetic macular edema; Ozurdex; Dexamethasone implant; Anti-VEGF; Meta-analysis; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BEVACIZUMAB; RANIBIZUMAB; EYES; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; BEVORDEX; OUTCOMES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-018-0779-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: This meta analysis evaluated the effectiveness and safety of dexarnethasone (DEX) implant and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: The PubMed, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov website and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched for studies comparing DEX implant with anti-VEGF in patients with DME. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (GST) and adverse events were extracted from the final eligible studies. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 for Mac was used to analyze the data and GRADE profiler were used to access the quality of outcomes. Results: Based on four randomized clinical trials assessing a total of 521 eyes, the DEX implant can achieve visual acuity improvement for DME at rates similar to those achieved via anti-VEGF treatment (mean difference [MD] = - 0.43, P = 0.35), with superior anatomic outcomes at 6 months (MD = - 86.71 mu m, P = 0.02), while requiring fewer injections, in comparison to anti-VEGF treatment. Although the mean reduction in GST did not showed significant difference at 12 months (MD = - 33.77 pm, P = 0.21), the significant in BCVA from baseline to 12 months supported the anti-VEGF treatment (MD = - 3.26, P< 0.00001). No statistically significant differences in terms of the serious adverse events. However, use of the DEX implant has higher risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract than anti-VEGF treatment. Conclusions: Compared with anti-VEGF, DEX implant improved anatomical outcomes significantly. However, this did not translate to improved visual acuity, which may be due to the progression of cataract. Therefore, the DEX implant may be recommended as a first chioce for select cases, such as for pseudophakic eyes, anti-VEGF-resistant eyes, or patients reluctant to receive intravitreal injections frequently.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor combined with intravitreal steroids for diabetic macular oedema
    Mehta, Hemal
    Hennings, Charles
    Gillies, Mark C.
    Vuong Nguyen
    Campain, Anna
    Fraser-Bell, Samantha
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (04):
  • [22] Comparison of the efficacy of intravitreal Anti-VEGF versus intravitreal dexamethasone implant in treatment resistant diabetic Macular Edema
    Koc, Hakan
    Alpay, Atilla
    Ugurbas, Suat Hayri
    [J]. BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [23] Comparison of the efficacy of intravitreal Anti-VEGF versus intravitreal dexamethasone implant in treatment resistant diabetic Macular Edema
    Hakan Koc
    Atilla Alpay
    Suat Hayri Ugurbas
    [J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 23
  • [24] Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema
    Panozzo, Giacomo
    Gusson, Elena
    Casati, Stefano
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [25] Influence of the vitreomacular interface on the course of diabetic macular edema after treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections
    Sanchez, Sandra Gomez
    Valldeperas, Xavier
    Esteve, Maria
    Oller-Sales, Benjami
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [26] Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in diabetic macular edema
    Kim, Moosang
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2016, 12 : 1355 - 1356
  • [27] Predictive factors for treatment outcomes with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in diabetic macular edema in clinical practice
    Rajya L Gurung
    Liesel M FitzGerald
    Ebony Liu
    Bennet J McComish
    Georgia Kaidonis
    Bronwyn Ridge
    Alex W Hewitt
    Brendan J Vote
    Nitin Verma
    Jamie E Craig
    Kathryn P Burdon
    [J]. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 9
  • [28] Predictive factors for treatment outcomes with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in diabetic macular edema in clinical practice
    Gurung, Rajya L.
    FitzGerald, Liesel M.
    Liu, Ebony
    McComish, Bennet J.
    Kaidonis, Georgia
    Ridge, Bronwyn
    Hewitt, Alex W.
    Vote, Brendan J.
    Verma, Nitin
    Craig, Jamie E.
    Burdon, Kathryn P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETINA AND VITREOUS, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [29] Intravitreal dexamethasone implant combined with bevacizumab versus intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema
    Gong, Yeseul
    Kang, Kuidong
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2021, 99
  • [30] Intravitreal triamcinolone versus intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema:a meta-analysis
    Xiao-Ling Zhang
    Jian Chen
    Ri-Jia Zhang
    Wen-Jie Wang
    Qing Zhou
    Xiao-Yan Qin
    [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013, (04) : 546 - 552