Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer

被引:589
|
作者
Patz, Edward F., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Pinsky, Paul [3 ]
Gatsonis, Constantine [4 ,5 ]
Sicks, JoRean D. [4 ]
Kramer, Barnett S. [3 ]
Tammemaegi, Martin C. [6 ]
Chiles, Caroline [7 ]
Black, William C. [8 ]
Aberle, Denise R. [9 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol & Canc Biol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] NCI, Canc Prevent Div, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Brown Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Stat Sci, Providence, RI USA
[5] Brown Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Providence, RI USA
[6] Brock Univ, Dept Community Hlth Sci, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[7] Wake Forest Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[8] Dartmouth Coll, Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dartmouth Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Hanover, NH 03756 USA
[9] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FOLLOW-UP; PROJECT; BIAS; MORTALITY; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12738
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Screening for lung cancer has the potential to reduce mortality, but in addition to detecting aggressive tumors, screening will also detect indolent tumors that otherwise may not cause clinical symptoms. These overdiagnosis cases represent an important potential harm of screening because they incur additional cost, anxiety, and morbidity associated with cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE To estimate overdiagnosis in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We used data from the NLST, a randomized trial comparing screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) vs chest radiography (CXR) among 53 452 persons at high risk for lung cancer observed for 6.4 years, to estimate the excess number of lung cancers in the LDCT arm of the NLST compared with the CXR arm. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We calculated 2 measures of overdiagnosis: the probability that a lung cancer detected by screening with LDCT is an overdiagnosis (P-S), defined as the excess lung cancers detected by LDCT divided by all lung cancers detected by screening in the LDCT arm; and the number of cases that were considered overdiagnosis relative to the number of persons needed to screen to prevent 1 death from lung cancer. RESULTS During follow-up, 1089 lung cancers were reported in the LDCT arm and 969 in the CXR arm of the NLST. The probability is 18.5% (95% CI, 5.4%-30.6%) that any lung cancer detected by screening with LDCT was an overdiagnosis, 22.5% (95% CI, 9.7%-34.3%) that a non-small cell lung cancer detected by LDCT was an overdiagnosis, and 78.9% (95% CI, 62.2%-93.5%) that a bronchioalveolar lung cancer detected by LDCT was an overdiagnosis. The number of cases of overdiagnosis found among the 320 participants who would need to be screened in the NLST to prevent 1 death from lung cancer was 1.38. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE More than 18% of all lung cancers detected by LDCT in the NLST seem to be indolent, and overdiagnosis should be considered when describing the risks of LDCT screening for lung cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The future of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography
    Jaklitsch, Michael T.
    Jacobson, Francine L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 160 (01): : 289 - 294
  • [22] Lung-Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Gould, Michael K.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (19): : 1813 - 1820
  • [23] Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Lei, Fang
    Lee, Eunice
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2019, 46 (02) : E60 - E71
  • [24] Lung Cancer Screening: Use of Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Martinez Perez, Encarnacion
    de Aguiar Quevedo, Karol
    Arraras Martinez, Miguel
    Cruz Mojarrieta, Julia
    Fernandez de Moya, Estanislao Arana
    Barrios Benito, Maria
    Hinarejos Parga, Susana
    Cervera Deval, Jose
    Penalver Cuesta, Juan Carlos
    [J]. ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2019, 55 (10): : 526 - 531
  • [25] Lung cancer screening by low-dose spiral computed tomography
    van Klaveren, RJ
    Habbema, JDF
    Pedersen, JH
    de Koning, HJ
    Oudkerk, M
    Hoogsteden, HC
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (05) : 857 - 866
  • [26] Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography
    Jett, JR
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH CENTRAL EUROPEAN LUNG CANCER CONFERENCE, 2004, : 27 - 32
  • [27] The role of low-dose computed tomography in lung cancer screening
    Agh Tamas
    Szilberhorn Laszlo
    Csanadi Marcell
    Szeles Gyorgy
    Voko Zoltan
    Adam Gabor
    Kallai Arpad
    [J]. ORVOSI HETILAP, 2022, 163 (37) : 1464 - 1471
  • [28] Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography Response
    Humphrey, Linda L.
    Deffebach, Mark
    Pappas, Miranda
    Zakher, Bernadette
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (03) : 212 - 212
  • [29] Overdiagnosis of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography screening: meta-analysis of the randomised clinical trials
    Brodersen, John
    Voss, Theis
    Martiny, Frederik
    Siersma, Volkert
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Heleno, Bruno
    [J]. BREATHE, 2020, 16 (01)
  • [30] Impact of annual trend volume of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening on overdiagnosis, overmanagement, and gender disparities
    Hsin-Hung, Chen
    En-Kuei, Tang
    Yun-Ju, Wu
    Fu-Zong, Wu
    [J]. CANCER IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)