Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data

被引:42
|
作者
Marin, Diego [1 ]
Xu, Jia [1 ]
Treff, Nathan R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Genom Predict, 675 US Highway One, North Brunswick, NJ 08902 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; INNER CELL MASS; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN EMBRYOS; MOSAICISM; TIME; VALIDATION; CONSEQUENCES; SELECTION; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1002/pd.5828
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) reduces miscarriage risk, increases the success of IVF, shortens time to pregnancy, and reduces multiple gestation rates without compromising outcomes. The progression of PGT-A has included common application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) from single nucleotide polymorphism microarray, quantitative real-time PCR, and array comparative hybridization platforms of analysis. Additional putative advances in PGT-A capability include classifying embryos as mosaic and predicting the presence of segmental imbalance. A critical component in the process of technical validation of these advancements involves evaluation of concordance between reanalysis results and initial testing results. While many independent studies have investigated the concordance of results obtained from the remaining embryo with the original PGT-A diagnosis, compilation and systematic analysis of published data has not been performed. Here, we review results from 26 primary research articles describing concordance in 1271 human blastocysts from 2260 pairwise comparisons. Results illustrate significantly higher discordance from PGT-A methods which utilize NGS and include prediction of mosaicism or segmental imbalance. These results suggest caution when considering new iterations PGT-A.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 553
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: predictive embryonic factors
    Florensa, Mireia
    Cladellas, Anna
    Ballesteros, Agustin
    Esbert, Marga
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2024, 41 (05) : 1329 - 1339
  • [32] Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy - a Castle Built on Sand
    Gleicher, Norbert
    Patrizio, Pasquale
    Brivanlou, Ali
    [J]. TRENDS IN MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 27 (08) : 731 - 742
  • [33] Impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on obstetrical practice
    Chan, Yiu-man
    Li, Tin-chiu
    Poon, Liona C. Y.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 31 (02) : 127 - 131
  • [34] PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR ANEUPLOIDY: IS IT REALLY COST EFFECTIVE?
    Saad-Naguib, Michael
    Timmons, Douglas
    Attia, George R.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E435 - E435
  • [35] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in uterus transplant patients
    Chattopadhyay, Rhea
    Richards, Elliott
    Libby, Valerie
    Flyckt, Rebecca
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 15
  • [36] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: helpful but not a first choice
    Sachiko Ohishi
    Tetsuo Otani
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 161 - 168
  • [37] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: challenges in clinical practice
    Yang, Hui
    DeWan, Andrew Thomas
    Desai, Mayur M. M.
    Vermund, Sten H. H.
    [J]. HUMAN GENOMICS, 2022, 16 (01)
  • [38] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: helpful but not a first choice
    Ohishi, Sachiko
    Otani, Tetsuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (01) : 161 - 168
  • [39] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: costly or cost effective?
    Robins, Jared C.
    McQueen, Dana B.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (05) : 851 - 851
  • [40] The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a committee opinion
    Orvieto, Raoul
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 122 (03) : 555 - 555