Blonanserin for schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, controlled trials

被引:53
|
作者
Kishi, Taro [1 ]
Matsuda, Yuki [1 ]
Nakamura, Hiroshi [2 ]
Iwata, Nakao [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[2] Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co Ltd, CNS Prod Management & Promot Planning, Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1048356, Japan
关键词
Schizophrenia; Antipsychotic; Blonanserin; Risperidone; Haloperidol; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; AKATHISIA; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.10.011
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: There is uncertainty about the efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin in schizophrenia. Method: PubMed, the Cochrane Library databases, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched up to September 2012. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized, controlled trials comparing blonanserin with other antipsychotics were conducted. The risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), numbers-needed-to-harm (NNH), and weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated. Results: Four studies (total n = 1080) were identified (vs. risperidone studies [n = 508], vs. haloperidol studies [n = 572]). Comparing blonanserin with other pooled antipsychotics, there were no significant differences in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (p = 0.75), PANSS positive (p = 0.41), PANSS negative (p = 0.09), and PANSS general psychopathology subscale scores (p = 0.96), and response rate (p = 0.72). However, blonanserin showed greater efficacy in PANSS negative subscale scores compared with haloperidol (WMD = -1.29, CI = -2.29 to -030, p = 0.01, I-2 = 0%). No significant differences were found in discontinuation rates between blonanserin and other pooled antipsychotics (due to any cause: p = 0.29, inefficacy: p = 0.32, adverse events: p = 0.56). Blonanserin had a 0.31 lower risk of hyperprolactinemia than the other pooled antipsychotics (CI = 0.20-0.49, NNH = not significant). While dizziness (RR = 0.47, CI = 0.23-0.93, NNH = not significant) and akathisia (RR = 0.54, CI = 0.32-0.90, NNH = 7) occurred significantly less often with blonanserin than with haloperidol, blonanserin had a 1.62 higher risk of akathisia than risperidone (CI = 1.18-2.22, NNH = 3). Conclusion: Our results suggest that although blonanserin has a more beneficial effect on negative symptoms than haloperidol, there was a significant difference in the adverse events profile between blonanserin and other antipsychotics. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 154
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials using probiotics in chronic periodontitis
    Ikram, Sana
    Hassan, Nuzhat
    Raffat, Muhammad A.
    Mirza, Sana
    Akram, Zohaib
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 9 (03) : e12338
  • [32] Adjunctive ondansetron for schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zheng, Wei
    Cai, Dong-Bin
    Zhang, Qing-E.
    He, Jie
    Zhong, Li-Yun
    Sim, Kang
    Ungvari, Gabor S.
    Ning, Yu-Ping
    Xiang, Yu-Tao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2019, 113 : 27 - 33
  • [33] Lithium for schizophrenia revisited: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Leucht, S
    Kissling, W
    McGrath, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 65 (02) : 177 - 186
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of lurasidone for schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eight short-term, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials
    Gao, Shan
    Fan, Ling
    Yu, Zhigang
    Xie, Xingxing
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL REPORTS, 2024, 20 (06)
  • [35] Blonanserin patch vs. Other Antipsychotics for Acute Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trials in Japan
    Kishi, Taro
    Yoshimura, Reiji
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2020, 53 (03) : 122 - 132
  • [36] Estradiol and raloxifene as adjunctive treatment for women with schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials
    Li, Zijia
    Wang, Yucheng
    Wang, Zhe
    Kong, Lingtao
    Liu, Linzi
    Li, Liu
    Tang, Yanqing
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 147 (04) : 360 - 372
  • [37] A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ketamine in the rapid treatment of major depressive episodes
    McGirr, A.
    Berlim, M. T.
    Bond, D. J.
    Fleck, M. P.
    Yatham, L. N.
    Lam, R. W.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (04) : 693 - 704
  • [38] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials of GABAB Receptor Agonists on Regulating Human Cough
    Wei, Weili
    ZhangTong, Yangzi
    Chen, Qiang
    Yu, Li
    Qiu, Zhongmin
    [J]. CHEST, 2016, 149 (04) : 549A - 549A
  • [39] EFFECTS OF GLUTAMATE MODULATORS ON COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: A META-ANALYSIS OF DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Iwata, Yusuke
    Uchida, Hiroyuki
    Suzuki, Takefumi
    Keefe, Richard
    Plitman, Eric Alexander
    Mimura, Masaru
    Graff-Guerrero, Ariel
    Nakajima, Shinichiro
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2015, 41 : S316 - S316
  • [40] Effect of magnesium supplementation on glucose metabolism in people with or at risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials
    Veronese, N.
    Watutantrige-Fernando, S.
    Luchini, C.
    Solmi, M.
    Sartore, G.
    Sergi, G.
    Manzato, E.
    Barbagallo, M.
    Maggi, S.
    Stubbs, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2016, 70 (12) : 1354 - 1359