Drug therapy for treating post-dural puncture headache

被引:50
|
作者
Basurto Ona, Xavier [1 ]
Osorio, Dimelza [2 ]
Bonfill Cosp, Xavier [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Figueres, Fdn Salut Emporda, Emergency Dept, Figueres 17600, Girona Cataluny, Spain
[2] Univ Tecnol Equinoccial, Fac Ciencias Salud Eugenio Espejo, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, CIBERESP, Biomed Res Inst Sant Pau IIB Sant Pau, Iberoamer Cochrane Ctr, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone [therapeutic use; Amines [therapeutic use; Analgesics [therapeutic use; Caffeine [therapeutic use; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids [therapeutic use; Hydrocortisone [therapeutic use; Pain Measurement [methods; Post-Dural Puncture Headache [drug therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spinal Puncture [adverse effects; Sumatriptan [therapeutic use; Theophylline [therapeutic use; Treatment Outcome; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid [therapeutic use; Female; Humans; Male; EPIDURAL BLOOD PATCH; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; ACCIDENTAL DURAL PUNCTURE; LUMBAR-PUNCTURE; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; POSTSPINAL HEADACHE; OBSERVER-BLIND; PAIN SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007887.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 8, 2011, on 'Drug therapy for treating post-dural puncture headache'. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common complication of lumbar puncture, an invasive procedure frequently performed in the emergency room. Numerous pharmaceutical drugs have been proposed to treat PDPH but there are still some uncertainties about their clinical effectiveness. Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of drugs for treating PDPH in adults and children. Search methods The searches included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2014, Issue 6), MEDLINE and MEDLINE in Process (from 1950 to 29 July 2014), EMBASE (from 1980 to 29 July 2014) and CINAHL (from 1982 to July 2014). There were no language restrictions. Selection criteria We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of any pharmacological drug used for treating PDPH. Outcome measures considered for this review were: PDPH persistence of any severity at follow-up (primary outcome), daily activity limited by headache, conservative supplementary therapeutic option offered, epidural blood patch performed, change in pain severity scores, improvements in pain severity scores, number of days participants stay in hospital, any possible adverse events and missing data. Data collection and analysis Review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We estimated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. We calculated a 95% confidence interval (CI) for each RR and MD. We did not undertake meta-analysis because the included studies assessed different sorts of drugs or different outcomes. We performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Main results We included 13 small RCTs (479 participants) in this review (at least 274 participants were women, with 118 parturients after a lumbar puncture for regional anaesthesia). In the original version of this Cochrane review, only seven small RCTs (200 participants) were included. Pharmacological drugs assessed were oral and intravenous caffeine, subcutaneous sumatriptan, oral gabapentin, oral pregabalin, oral theophylline, intravenous hydrocortisone, intravenous cosyntropin and intramuscular adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Two RCTs reported data for PDPH persistence of any severity at follow-up (primary outcome). Caffeine reduced the number of participants with PDPH at one to two hours when compared to placebo. Treatment with caffeine also decreased the need for a conservative supplementary therapeutic option. Treatment with gabapentin resulted in better visual analogue scale (VAS) scores after one, two, three and four days when compared with placebo and also when compared with ergotamine plus caffeine at two, three and four days. Treatment with hydrocortisone plus conventional treatment showed better VAS scores at six, 24 and 48 hours when compared with conventional treatment alone and also when compared with placebo. Treatment with theophylline showed better VAS scores compared with acetaminophen at two, six and 12 hours and also compared with conservative treatment at eight, 16 and 24 hours. Theophylline also showed a lower mean "sum of pain" when compared with placebo. Sumatriptan and ACTH did not show any relevant effect for this outcome. Theophylline resulted in a higher proportion of participants reporting an improvement in pain scores when compared with conservative treatment. There were no clinically significant drug adverse events. The rest of the outcomes were not reported by the included RCTs or did not show any relevant effect. Authors' conclusions None of the new included studies have provided additional information to change the conclusions of the last published version of the original Cochrane review. Caffeine has shown effectiveness for treating PDPH, decreasing the proportion of participants with PDPH persistence and those requiring supplementary interventions, when compared with placebo. Gabapentin, hydrocortisone and theophylline have been shown to decrease pain severity scores. Theophylline has also been shown to increase the proportion of participants that report an improvement in pain scores when compared with conventional treatment. There is a lack of conclusive evidence for the other drugs assessed (sumatriptan, adrenocorticotropic hormone, pregabalin and cosyntropin). These conclusions should be interpreted with caution, due to the lack of information to allow correct appraisal of risk of bias, the small sample sizes of the studies and also their limited generalisability, as nearly half of the participants were postpartum women in their 30s.
引用
收藏
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of Cervical Post-Dural Puncture Headache
    Abrams, Winfred B.
    Park, Jae H.
    Stiles, Nicholas
    To-Nhu Vu
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (12) : 3715 - 3718
  • [32] Decreasing the incidence of post-dural puncture headache
    Kopf, A
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 48 (07) : 927 - 927
  • [33] Risk factors in post-dural puncture headache
    Rodriguez-Camacho, M.
    Guirado-Ruiz, P. A.
    Barrero-Hernandez, F. J.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2023, 223 (06): : 331 - 339
  • [34] Timing of post-dural puncture headache symptoms
    Daunt, M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (07) : 785 - 785
  • [35] Triptans use in post-dural puncture headache
    Mainardi, Federico
    Zanchin, Giorgio
    Lisotto, Carlo
    Maggioni, Ferdinando
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2018, 19
  • [36] Impact of obesity on post-dural puncture headache
    Song, J.
    Zhang, T.
    Choy, A.
    Penaco, A.
    Joseph, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 30 : 5 - 9
  • [37] Late recurrence of post-dural puncture headache
    Goksel, Basak Karakurum
    Tanburoglu, Anil
    Karatas, Mehmet
    Altinkaya, Naime
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2021, 33 (04): : 261 - 264
  • [38] Post-dural puncture headache in the parturiente - an update
    Boyle, Jeremy A. H.
    Stocks, Gary M.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (08): : 302 - 304
  • [39] Decreasing the incidence of post-dural puncture headache: An update
    Kuczkowski, KM
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 49 (04) : 594 - 594
  • [40] Dexmedetomidine nebulization: an answer to post-dural puncture headache?
    Kumar, A.
    Kumar, A.
    Sinha, C.
    Anant, M.
    Singh, J. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2019, 40 : 155 - 156