A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

被引:293
|
作者
Mazzocca, AD [1 ]
Santangelo, SA [1 ]
Johnson, ST [1 ]
Rios, CG [1 ]
Dumonski, ML [1 ]
Arciero, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2006年 / 34卷 / 02期
关键词
shoulder; acromioclavicular joint; biomechanics; surgery; anatomical reconstruction;
D O I
10.1177/0363546505281795
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite numerous surgical techniques described, there have been few studies evaluating the biomechanical performance of acromioclavicular joint reconstructions. Purpose: To compare a newly developed anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure and a recently described arthroscopic method using ultrastrong nonabsorbable suture material. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Forty-two fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (72.8 +/- 13.4 years) were randomly assigned to 3 groups: arthroscopic reconstruction, anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction, and a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. Bone mineral density was obtained on all specimens. Specimens were tested to 70 N in 3 directions, anterior, posterior, and superior, comparing the intact to the reconstructed states. Superior cyclic loading at 70 N for 3000 cycles was then performed at a rate of 1 Hz, followed by a load to failure test (120 mm/min) to simulate physiologic states at the acromioclavicular joint. Results: In comparison to the intact state, the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure had significantly (P < .05) greater laxity than the anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction or the arthroscopic reconstruction. There were no significant differences in bone mineral density (g/cm(2)), load to failure, superior migration over 3000 cycles, or superior displacement. The anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction had significantly less (P < .05) anterior and posterior translation than the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. The arthroscopic reconstruction yielded significantly less anterior displacement (P < .05) than the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. Conclusion: The anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction has less anterior and posterior translation and more closely approximates the intact state, restoring function of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments. Clinical Relevance: A more anatomical reconstruction using a free tendon graft of both the trapezoid and conoid ligaments may provide a stronger, permanent biologic solution for dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. This reconstruction may minimize recurrent subluxation and residual pain and permit earlier rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 246
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anatomical Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Petersen, W.
    [J]. ARTHROSKOPIE, 2007, 20 (02) : 93 - 93
  • [42] Evaluation of the clavicular tunnel placement on coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocations: a finite element analysis
    Onur Kocadal
    Korcan Yüksel
    Melih Güven
    [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 1891 - 1896
  • [43] Editorial Commentary: Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction. Double Up It Is?
    Hohmann, Erik
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (05): : 1271 - 1272
  • [44] Early failure of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using TightRope system
    Singh, Bijayendra
    Mohanlal, Paras
    Bawale, Rajesh
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2016, 82 (01): : 119 - 123
  • [45] ACROMIOCLAVICULAR AND CORACOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING A SINGLE TENDON GRAFT
    Campbell, S.
    Shin, S.
    Scott, J.
    Hwang, J.
    Lee, T. Q.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (01) : 241 - 242
  • [46] Early failures with single clavicular transosseous coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction
    Cook, Jay B.
    Shaha, James S.
    Rowles, Douglas J.
    Bottoni, Craig R.
    Shaha, Steven H.
    Tokish, John M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (12) : 1746 - 1752
  • [47] Surgical Pearls and Pitfalls for Anatomic Acromioclavicular/ Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction
    Chang, Peter S.
    Murphy, Colin P.
    Whalen, Ryan J.
    Apostolakos, John M.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    [J]. CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (04) : 621 - 632
  • [48] Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction (ACCR)
    Virk, Mandeep S.
    Mazzocca, Augustus D.
    [J]. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 22 (03) : 227 - 233
  • [49] Open Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries
    Cain Jr, E. Lyle
    Parker, David
    [J]. CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (04) : 589 - 598
  • [50] REVIEW OF CORACOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING DACRON GRAFT MATERIAL
    GOLDBERG, JA
    VIGLIONE, W
    CUMMING, WJ
    WADDELL, FS
    RUZ, PA
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 57 (07): : 441 - 445