Demography and Modeling To Improve Pesticide Risk Assessment of Endangered Species

被引:0
|
作者
Stark, John D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Puyallup Res & Extens Ctr, Puyallup, WA 98371 USA
关键词
LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS; POPULATION-LEVEL; TOXICITY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; TIME;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The present ecological risk assessment process for pesticides as practiced by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) consists of developing short-term toxicity data for a few select species and comparing these data to expected environmental concentrations to develop risk quotients (RQ). Risk quotients are then compared to "levels of concern" (LOC) which vary depending upon the type of pesticide being evaluated and the type of organisms likely to be exposed. The LOC is supposed to account for all of the types of uncertainty associated with the risk assessment. There are several problems associated with this process. For example, populations do not respond the same way to wtoxicant exposures as do individuals. Populations, if thinned may compensate for losses and actually grow faster than expected. Furthermore, exposure to pesticides can result in a proportion of a population dying while the remaining individuals are impaired due to multiple sublethal effects. Another issue is that the few species that are used for the development of toxicity data may not be good representatives of the many species they are supposed to protect. These species are often chosen based on ease of rearing and evaluation, not because they are good representatives of many species. Susceptibility of a population to pesticides is influenced by life history traits and differences in life history traits are not considered in the current risk assessment process. It has also been shown that populations of organisms often exist as mixtures of life stages. The makeup of the population structure can greatly influence susceptibility to pesticides and this is also not considered in the risk assessment process. Furthermore, different life stages may exhibit vastly different susceptibility to toxicants, yet usually only one life stage is evaluated. In this chapter, the current risk assessment process and new approaches to improve risk assessment of pesticides are discussed. The new approach consists of developing population-level measures of toxicant effect that incorporate the total effect (lethal and multiple sublethal effects) followed by population modeling to determine the probability that specific concentrations of pesticides will drive populations to extirpation or whether populations will recover.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 270
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment for learning: An endangered species?
    Popham, WJ
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2006, 63 (05) : 82 - 83
  • [32] Risk Assessment Considerations With Regard to the Potential Impacts of Pesticides on Endangered Species
    Brain, Richard A.
    Teed, R. Scott
    Bang, JiSu
    Thorbek, Pernille
    Perine, Jeff
    Peranginangin, Natalia
    Kim, Myoungwoo
    Valenti, Ted
    Chen, Wenlin
    Breton, Roger L.
    Rodney, Sara I.
    Moore, Dwayne R. J.
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 11 (01) : 102 - 117
  • [33] Consistent Extinction Risk Assessment under the US Endangered Species Act
    Boyd, Charlotte
    DeMaster, Douglas P.
    Waples, Robin S.
    Ward, Eric J.
    Taylor, Barbara L.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (03): : 328 - 336
  • [34] Studies on ecological risk assessment of pesticide using species sensitivity distribution
    Nagai, Takashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 2017, 42 (3-4) : 124 - 131
  • [35] Ecological Modeling for Pesticide Risk Assessment for Honey Bees and Other Pollinators
    Grimm, V.
    Becher, M. A.
    Kennedy, P.
    Thorbek, P.
    Osborne, J.
    [J]. PESTICIDE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR POLLINATORS, 2014, : 147 - 160
  • [36] Validating datasets representing non-agricultural pesticide use sites for the assessment of pesticides and endangered species
    McGaughey, Bernalyn
    Hall, Tilghman
    Tang, Zhenxu
    Carr, Katherine
    Frank, Ashlea
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 250
  • [37] Improving risk assessment: Research opportunities in dose response modeling to improve risk assessment
    Zeise, L
    Hattis, D
    Andersen, M
    Bailer, AJ
    Bayard, S
    Chen, C
    Clewell, H
    Conolly, R
    Crump, K
    Dunson, D
    Finkel, A
    Haber, L
    Jarabek, AM
    Kodell, R
    Krewski, D
    Thomas, D
    Thorslund, T
    Wassell, JT
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (06): : 1421 - 1444
  • [38] Endangered Species Act considerations in planning and implementing pesticide use
    Roberts, Carol
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [39] Pesticide Regulation and Endangered Species: Moving from Stalemate to Solutions
    Racke, Kenneth D.
    McGaughey, Bernalyn D.
    [J]. PESTICIDE REGULATION AND THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT, 2012, 1111 : 3 - +
  • [40] Recommendations for Improvements to Pesticide Regulation in Compliance with the Endangered Species Act
    McGaughey, Bernalyn D.
    Hall, A. Tilghman
    Racke, Kenneth D.
    [J]. PESTICIDE REGULATION AND THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT, 2012, 1111 : 343 - +