Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR

被引:8
|
作者
Wang, Di [1 ]
Jiao, Xinya [2 ]
Jia, Haijiang [3 ]
Cheng, Shumei [2 ]
Jin, Xi [4 ]
Wang, Youhua [5 ]
Gao, Yunhua [1 ]
Su, Xiaofeng [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Metrol, Ctr Adv Measurement Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Baoding, Peoples R China
[3] Raw Mat Technol Ctr Guangxi Tobacco, Nanning, Peoples R China
[4] Baoding Univ, Hebei Technol Innovat Ctr Green Management Soil Bo, Baoding, Hebei, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Biotechnol Res Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
droplet digital PCR; quantitative real-time PCR; sensitivity; quantification; tolerance; GUIDELINES MINIMUM INFORMATION; ALBO-ATRUM; ASSAY; PUBLICATION; PLATFORMS; STANDARD; PLANTS; WILT;
D O I
10.3389/fcimb.2022.995705
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Vascular wilt, caused by Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum, limits the quality and yield of agricultural crops. Although quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has greatly improved the diagnosis of these two pathogens over traditional, time-consuming isolation methods, the relatively poor detection sensitivity and high measurement bias for traceable matrix-rich samples need to be improved. Here, we thus developed a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for accurate, sensitive detection and quantification of V. dahliae and V. longisporum. We compared the analytical and diagnostic performance in detail of ddPCR and the corresponding qPCR assay against the genomic DNA (gDNA) of the two fungi from cultures and field samples. In our study, the species specificity, quantification linearity, analytical sensitivity, and measurement viability of the two methods were analyzed. The results indicated that ddPCR using field samples enhanced diagnostic sensitivity, decreased quantification bias, and indicated less susceptibility to inhibitors compared with qPCR. Although ddPCR was as sensitive as qPCR when using gDNA from cultures of V. dahliae and V. longisporum, its detection rates using field samples were much higher than those of qPCR, potentially due to the inhibition from residual matrix in the extracts. The results showed that digital PCR is more sensitive and accurate than qPCR for quantifying trace amounts of V. dahliae and V. longisporum and can facilitate management practices to limit or prevent their prevalence.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of droplet digital PCR with quantitative real-time PCR for determination of zygosity in transgenic maize
    Xu, Xiaoli
    Peng, Cheng
    Wang, Xiaofu
    Chen, Xiaoyun
    Wang, Qiang
    Xu, Junfeng
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (06) : 855 - 864
  • [32] Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR vs reverse transcriptase quantitative real-time PCR for serum HBV RNA quantification
    Limothai, Umaporn
    Chuaypen, Natthaya
    Poovorawan, Kittiyod
    Chotiyaputta, Watcharasak
    Tanwandee, Tawesak
    Poovorawan, Yong
    Tangkijvanich, Pisit
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (12) : 3365 - 3372
  • [33] A real-time PCR and digital droplet PCR assay for quantification of Polymyxa betae in sugar beet roots
    Smith, B.
    Martin, F.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 106 (12) : 33 - 33
  • [34] Comparison between RT droplet digital PCR and RT real-time PCR for quantification of noroviruses in oysters
    Persson, Sofia
    Eriksson, Ronnie
    Lowther, James
    Ellstrom, Patrik
    Simonsson, Magnus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 284 : 73 - 83
  • [35] Quantification of V(D)J recombination by real-time quantitative PCR
    Braikia, Fatima-Zohra
    Chemin, Guillaume
    Moutahir, Mohammed
    Khamlichi, Ahmed Amine
    IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 162 (01) : 119 - 123
  • [36] A Comparison of Real-Time PCR Protocols for the Quantitative Monitoring of Asymptomatic Olive Infections by Verticillium dahliae Pathotypes
    Gramaje, D.
    Perez-Serrano, V.
    Montes-Borrego, M.
    Navas-Cortes, J. A.
    Jimenez-Diaz, R. M.
    Landa, B. B.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 103 (10) : 1058 - 1068
  • [37] Droplet digital PCR improves urinary exosomal miRNA detection compared to real-time PCR
    Wang, Cong
    Ding, Qiang
    Plant, Pamela
    Basheer, Mayada
    Yang, Chuance
    Tawedrous, Eriny
    Krizova, Adriana
    Boulos, Carl
    Farag, Mina
    Cheng, Yufeng
    Yousef, George M.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 67 : 54 - 59
  • [38] Comparison of droplet digital PCR vs real-time PCR for Yersinia enterocolitica detection in vegetables
    Cristiano, D.
    Peruzy, M. F.
    Aponte, M.
    Mancusi, A.
    Proroga, Y. T. R.
    Capuano, F.
    Murru, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 354
  • [39] Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil
    Tae Gwan Kim
    So-Yeon Jeong
    Kyung-Suk Cho
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98 : 6105 - 6113
  • [40] Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil
    Kim, Tae Gwan
    Jeong, So-Yeon
    Cho, Kyung-Suk
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 98 (13) : 6105 - 6113