Identification of marine management priority areas using a GIS-based multi-criteria approach

被引:20
|
作者
Nelson, Kathryn [1 ]
Burnside, Niall G. [2 ]
机构
[1] 12A Riverside Business Ctr, Sussex Inshore Fisheries & Conservat Author, Brighton Rd, Shoreham By Sea BN43 6RE, W Sussex, England
[2] Univ Brighton, Sch Environm & Technol, Ctr Aquat Environm, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, E Sussex, England
关键词
Coastal zone; Fisheries management; GIS; Multi-criteria modelling; Priority modelling; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FISHING EFFORT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSERVATION; COASTAL; LANDSCAPE; FISHERIES; HABITATS; RISK; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.002
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
There is a global issue of balancing resource exploitation with environmental protection. In particular, the marine environment is subject to many anthropogenic pressures which are most severe in coastal zones. Authorities managing these pressures have limited time and resources, so it is essential that they have access to data and modelling tools which help them prioritise their efforts. This study presents a spatial modelling approach which draws together a range of key criteria into a single framework to identify marine areas which should be prioritised for management and monitoring. The study area, Sussex coastal waters (southern UK), was assessed through quantification and modelling of relative environmental score and fishing pressure score. Environmental score was assessed by combining ecosystem services provision, habitat diversity and sensitivity, based on seabed habitat data. Fishing pressure was assessed by combining fishing benefits, impacts and effort for specific local fisheries. The marine priority assessment was compared to the location of Marine Protected Areas to understand the relationship with existing management measures. High and very high priority classes covered just 5% of the study area, with the highest priority area between Selsey and Bognor Regis. These habitats were ones found to have high environmental score (rocky reefs and seaweed-dominated sediment) concurrent with high fishing pressure. This modelling approach suggests that these areas should be the focus of further research, monitoring and potentially management measures. There was no significant difference between the priority score inside the MPAs and those outside, however, the environmental score was significantly higher inside MPAs. These findings suggest current MPAs are protecting valuable and/or sensitive habitats and management within these sites may have resulted in less fishing pressure. Each multi-criteria element of the study individually advances our understanding of the value of this marine environment and the importance of fisheries in Sussex coastal waters. Together, the multi-criteria approach strengthens the knowledge of processes and interactions, building a robust evidence base for management decision making. A framework has been developed which, with the use of different or additional datasets, could be applied to many scenarios supporting environmental managers worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 92
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification and Mapping of Dengue Epidemics using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making. The Case of Delhi, India
    Sahdev, Seema
    Kumar, Manish
    JOURNAL OF SETTLEMENTS AND SPATIAL PLANNING, 2020, : 61 - 69
  • [42] Selection of Take-Off and Landing Sites for Firefighter Drones in Urban Areas Using a GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Model
    Kim, Min-Seok
    Hong, Won-Hwa
    Lee, Yoon-Ha
    Baek, Seung-Chan
    DRONES, 2022, 6 (12)
  • [43] Designating Appropriate Areas for Flood Mitigation and Rainwater Harvesting in Arid Region Using a GIS-based Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Abd-el-Kader, Mahmoud M.
    El-Feky, Ahmed M.
    Saber, Mohamed
    AlHarbi, Maged M.
    Alataway, Abed
    Alfaisal, Faisal M.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (03) : 1083 - 1108
  • [44] Designating Appropriate Areas for Flood Mitigation and Rainwater Harvesting in Arid Region Using a GIS-based Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Mahmoud M. Abd-el-Kader
    Ahmed M. El-Feky
    Mohamed Saber
    Maged M. AlHarbi
    Abed Alataway
    Faisal M. Alfaisal
    Water Resources Management, 2023, 37 : 1083 - 1108
  • [45] Effective management of the watershed in response to historical climate change using a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
    Arshed, Abu Bakar
    Masood, Mohammad
    Zafar, Muhammad Awais
    Nabi, Ghulam
    Iqbal, Mudassar
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 14 (09) : 3178 - 3202
  • [46] Identification of Priority Areas for Soil and Water Conservation Planning Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Choquet Integral
    Zhang, Haibo
    Zhang, Jianjun
    Zhang, Shouhong
    Yu, Chunxue
    Sun, Ruoxiu
    Wang, Dandan
    Zhu, Chunzhu
    Zhang, Jianan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (04)
  • [47] Soil erosion susceptibility mapping using a GIS-based multi-criteria decision approach: Case of district Chitral, Pakistan
    Aslam, Bilal
    Maqsoom, Ahsen
    Alaloul, Wesam Salah
    Musarat, Muhammad Ali
    Jabbar, Talha
    Zafar, Ahmed
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (02) : 1637 - 1649
  • [48] Land suitability assessment for major crops by using GIS-based multi-criteria approach in Andit Tid watershed, Ethiopia
    Yohannes, Hamere
    Soromessa, Teshome
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2018, 4 (01):
  • [49] GIS-based wind farm suitability assessment using fuzzy AHP multi-criteria approach: the case of Herat, Afghanistan
    Nasery S.
    Matci D.K.
    Avdan U.
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (12)
  • [50] Geospatial analysis of groundwater potential zones using GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making AHP approach
    Nandi, Debabrata
    Sing, Debasish
    Sahu, Pramod Chandra
    SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 10 (04)