Novice Teachers' Attention to Student Thinking

被引:188
|
作者
Levin, Daniel A. [1 ]
Hammer, David [1 ]
Coffey, Janet E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct EDCI, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
teacher education; science education; teacher development; attention; PROFESSIONAL GROWTH; PRESERVICE; CONSTRUCTION; STANDARDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0022487108330245
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Stage-based views of teacher development hold that novice teachers are unable to attend to students' thinking until they have begun to identify themselves as teachers and mastered classroom routines, and so the first emphases in learning to teach should be on forming routines and identity. The authors challenge those views, as others have done, with evidence of novices attending to students' thinking early in their teaching and offer framing as an alternative perspective on whether and how teachers attend to student thinking. By this account, most teachers work in professional contexts that focus their attention on curriculum, classroom routines, and their own behavior, rather than on student thinking. An account of framing suggests an early, strong emphasis on attention to student thinking in teacher education.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 154
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Student teachers' thinking about learning to teach: a study of student teachers of mathematics and science at the end of their initial training
    Postlethwaite, Keith
    Haggarty, Linda
    [J]. RESEARCH PAPERS IN EDUCATION, 2012, 27 (03) : 263 - 284
  • [22] Differences In Thinking Between Experienced And Novice Teachers When Solving Problematic Pedagogical Situations
    Pilvar, Anne
    Leijena, Ali
    [J]. Proceedings of 6th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 2015, 191 : 853 - 858
  • [23] How experienced chemistry teachers evaluate student thinking in chemistry
    Sevian, Hannah
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [24] Student teachers' mathematical questioning and courage in metaphorical thinking learning
    Hendriana, H.
    Hidayat, W.
    Ristiana, M. G.
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION ON SCIENCES, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (ICE-STEM), 2018, 948
  • [25] Preservice Teachers' Eliciting and Responding to Student Thinking in Lesson Plays
    Lee, Ji-Eun
    Lim, Woong
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (22)
  • [26] CHARACTERISTICS OF REFLECTIVE THINKING IN STUDENT TEACHERS OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE
    Chocholata, Jana
    [J]. RESEARCH IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2017, : 83 - 95
  • [27] REFLECTIVE THINKING CONTRIBUTION TO THE SUPPORTING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT TEACHERS
    Shavit, Pnina
    Moshe, Anat
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2017), 2017, : 3440 - 3444
  • [28] FOCUS ON THE STUDENT: CRITICAL THINKING SEMINARS AT THE TEACHERS TRAINING DEPARTMENT
    Georgeta, Mag Alina
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND EDUCATION (MSE 2011), VOL II, 2011, : 27 - 30
  • [29] Complementary assessments of prospective teachers' skill with eliciting student thinking
    Shaughnessy, Meghan
    Boerst, Timothy A.
    Farmer, Susanna Owens
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 22 (06) : 607 - 638
  • [30] MATHEMATICS TEACHERS' KNOWLEDGE OF STUDENT THINKING AND ITS REFLECTIONS ON THEIR INSTRUCTION
    Ozaltun, Aytug
    Guzel, Esra Bukova
    [J]. EDULEARN14: 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, : 138 - 148