Xenopus laevis sperm-egg adhesion is regulated by modifications in the sperm receptor and the egg vitelline envelope

被引:50
|
作者
Tian, JD
Gong, H
Thomsen, GH
Lennarz, WJ
机构
[1] SUNY STONY BROOK,DEPT BIOCHEM & CELL BIOL,STONY BROOK,NY 11794
[2] SUNY STONY BROOK,INST CELL & DEV BIOL,STONY BROOK,NY 11794
关键词
D O I
10.1006/dbio.1997.8607
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The biochemical and ultrastructural changes in the envelope of the Xenopus laevis egg that occur during oviposition and fertilization have been thoroughly studied (Hedrick, J. L., and Nishihara, D. M., Methods Cell Biol. 36, 231-247, 1991; Larabell, C. A., and Chandler, D. E., J. Electron Microsc. Tech. 17, 294-318, 1991). However, the biological significance of these changes with respect to gamete interaction has been unclear. In the current study, it was found that changes in the envelope are directly responsible for regulating sperm-egg adhesion, an initial step of fertilization. As a result of these transformations, sperm bind only to unfertilized oviposited eggs, not to oocytes or coelomic eggs. In addition, they do not bind to fertilized eggs. The molecular and cellular basis of the regulation of the sperm binding process was investigated in the context of our recent findings that two structurally related envelope glycoproteins, gp69/64, serve as sperm receptors during fertilization (Tian, J.-D., Gong, H., Thomsen, G. H., and Lennarz, W. J., J. Cell Biol. 136, 1099-1108, 1997). Although the purified gp69/64 glycoproteins isolated from the oocyte or coelomic egg envelopes exhibited sperm binding activity, when these proteins are part of the intact oocyte or coelomic egg envelopes, they are not accessible to either anti-gp69/64 antibodies or to sperm. During the conversion from the coelomic to the vitelline envelope, the gp69/64 sperm receptors become exposed on the surface, an event that correlates with proteolytic cleavage of gp43 and accompanying ultrastructural alterations in the envelope. Conversely, after fertilization, when the vitelline envelope of the egg is converted to the fertilization envelope of the zygote, limited proteolytic cleavage of the sperm receptor results in loss of sperm binding activity. In addition, formation of a fertilization layer on top of the structurally altered VE adds another physical block to sperm binding. These results provide new insights into structure-function relationships between envelope components of the anuran egg, and provide further evidence supporting the key role of gp69/64 as sperm receptors during X. laevis fertilization. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 153
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of carbohydrates in sperm-egg interaction
    TopferPetersen, E
    Dostalova, Z
    Calvete, JJ
    FATE OF THE MALE GERM CELL, 1997, 424 : 301 - 310
  • [42] Molecular biology of sperm-egg interactions
    Dean, J
    ANDROLOGIA, 2005, 37 (06) : 198 - 199
  • [43] A THERMODYNAMIC STUDY OF SPERM-EGG INTERACTION
    ELIA, V
    ROSATI, F
    BARONE, G
    MONROY, A
    LIQUORI, AM
    EMBO JOURNAL, 1983, 2 (11): : 2053 - 2058
  • [44] ELECTRICAL REGULATION OF SPERM-EGG FUSION
    JAFFE, LA
    CROSS, NL
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 48 : 191 - 200
  • [45] THE EFFECTS OF ANTIBODY SPERM-EGG INTERACTION
    ALEXANDER, NJ
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1988, 541 : 317 - 323
  • [46] The molecular basis of sperm-egg interactions
    Garbers, DL
    Quill, TA
    TESTIS: FROM STEM CELL TO SPERM FUNCTION, 2000, : 186 - 197
  • [47] HUMAN SPERM-EGG INTERACTION INVITRO
    SATHANANTHAN, AH
    NG, SC
    EDIRISINGHE, R
    RATNAM, SS
    WONG, PC
    GAMETE RESEARCH, 1986, 15 (04): : 317 - 326
  • [48] Sperm-egg plasma membrane interactions
    Primakoff, P
    DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 175 (02) : M1 - M1
  • [49] ROLE OF HEXOSAMINIDASE IN SPERM-EGG INTERACTION
    CACACE, MG
    YOKOTA, Y
    DEVELOPMENT GROWTH & DIFFERENTIATION, 1985, 27 (02) : 171 - 172
  • [50] Fertilization 1: Sperm-Egg Interaction
    Nishio, Shunsuke
    Matsuda, Tsukasa
    AVIAN REPRODUCTION: FROM BEHAVIOR TO MOLECULES, 2017, 1001 : 91 - 103