Evaluation of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases A Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

被引:21
|
作者
Armbruster, Marco [1 ]
Sourbron, Steven [2 ]
Haug, Alexander [3 ]
Zech, Christoph J. [4 ]
Ingrisch, Michael [1 ]
Auernhammer, Christoph J. [5 ]
Nikolaou, Konstantin [1 ]
Paprottka, Philipp M. [1 ]
Rist, Carsten [1 ]
Reiser, Maximilian F. [1 ]
Sommer, Wieland H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Clin Radiol, Univ Hosp Grosshadern, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Leeds, Div Med Phys, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Munich, Dept Nucl Med, Univ Hosp Grosshadern, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Basel, Dept Clin Radiol, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 2, Interdisciplinary Ctr Neuroendocrine Tumors Gastr, Univ Hosp Grosshadern, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
liver metastases; DCE-MRI; PET/CT; neuroendocrine tumor; HEPATIC METASTASES; BLOOD-FLOW; PERFUSION PARAMETERS; F-18-DOPA PET; CANCER-CELLS; TUMORS; MRI; GA-68-DOTATATE; QUANTIFICATION; MR/PET;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182a4eb4a
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and specific uptake values (SUVs) derived from (18)fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) and Ga-68-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotate (Ga-68-DOTATATE) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with liver metastases of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Methods A total of 42 patients with hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine neoplasms were prospectively enrolled and underwent both dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and PET/CT, using either F-18-FDG or Ga-68-DOTATATE as tracer. The DCE-MRI was performed at 3 T with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid acquiring 48 slices every 2.2 seconds for 5 minutes. Three regions of interest (ROIs) representing the liver background and up to 3 ROIs representing metastatic liver tissue were coregistered in the PET/CT and in the DCE-MRI data sets. For each patient, a dedicated dual-inlet, 2-compartment uptake model was fitted to the enhancement curves of DCE-MRI ROIs and perfusion parameters were calculated. Lesion-to-background ratios of SUVs were correlated with corresponding lesion-to-background ratios of the perfusion parameters arterial plasma flow, venous plasma flow, total plasma flow, extracellular mean transit time, extracellular volume, arterial flow fraction, intracellular uptake rate, and hepatic uptake fraction using the Spearman coefficient. Results Whereas the lesion-to-background ratios of arterial plasma flow and arterial flow fraction of liver metastases correlated negatively with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUVmean derived from Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT (r = -0.54, P < 0.001; r = -0.39, P < 0.001, respectively), they correlated positively with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUVmean derived from F-18-FDG-PET/CT (r = 0.51, P < 0.05; r = 0.68, P < 0.01, respectively). The lesion-to-background ratios of the DCE-MRI parameters extracellular mean transit time and extracellular volume correlated very weakly with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUVmean from Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT, whereas venous plasma flow, total plasma flow, hepatic uptake fraction, and intracellular uptake rate showed no correlation between DCE-MRI and PET/CT. Conclusions Both Ga-68-DOTATATE and (18)fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT partially correlate with MRI perfusion parameters from the dual-inlet, 2-compartment uptake model. The results indicate that the paired imaging methods deliver complementary functional information.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 14
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as Markers of Graft Viability in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Garika, Siva Srivastava
    Sharma, Anshul
    Razik, Abdul
    Sharma, Akshima
    Pandey, Ravindra Mohan
    Gamanagatti, Shivanand
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Mittal, Ravi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (01): : 88 - 95
  • [22] Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Assessing the Vascularity of Liver Metastases Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography
    Zheng, Yan-Ling
    Yin, Xiao-Yu
    Xie, Xiao-Yan
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    Xu, Zuo-Feng
    Liu, Guang-Jian
    Liang, Jin-Yu
    Lu, Ming-De
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (10) : 1403 - 1410
  • [23] Characterization of Focal Liver Masses A Multicenter Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Burrowes, David P.
    Medellin, Alexandra
    Harris, Allison C.
    Milot, Laurent
    Lethebe, Brendan C.
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (12) : 2581 - 2593
  • [24] Comparison between perfusion computed tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing glioblastoma microvasculature
    Jia, Zhong Zheng
    Shi, Wei
    Shi, Jin Long
    Shen, Dan Dan
    Gu, Hong Mei
    Zhou, Xue Jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 87 : 120 - 124
  • [25] Comparison Between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Resectability Assessment in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Yoo, Jeongin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (10) : 983 - 995
  • [26] Molecular imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Miles, K. A.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 65 (07) : 549 - 556
  • [28] Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Nagarajah, James
    Buchbender, Christian
    Hoffmann, Oliver
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt Michael
    Poeppel, Thorsten
    Forsting, Michael
    Quick, Harald H.
    Umutlu, Lale
    Kinner, Sonja
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (08) : 505 - 513
  • [29] Comparison of Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for the Evaluation Bone Invasion in Upper and Lower Gingival Cancers
    Lee, Young Chan
    Jung, Ah Ra
    Kwon, Oh Eun
    Kim, Eui-Jong
    Hong, Il Ki
    Lee, Jung-Woo
    Eun, Young-Gyu
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (04) : 875.e1 - 875.e9
  • [30] EVALUATION OF LOCAL RECURRENCE AFTER TREATMENT FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA BY CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASONOGRAPHY: COMPARISON WITH DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND/OR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Martin-Algibez, A.
    Fernandez-Vazquez, I.
    Lopez-Martinez, C.
    Gallego-Gallego, M. S.
    San Roman, R.
    Munoz-Codocero, C.
    Castellano-Tortajada, G.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 54 : S392 - S393