Activity regimes for 82Rb cardiac PET: Effects on absolute MBF and MPI

被引:5
|
作者
Hoff, Camilla M. [1 ]
Sorensen, Jens [2 ,3 ]
Christensen, Nana L. [1 ]
Bouchelouche, Kirsten [1 ,2 ]
Tolbod, Lars [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med & PET, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Radiol, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
PET; MPI; myocardial blood flow; instrumentation; image analysis; MYOCARDIAL BLOOD-FLOW; RB-82; PET; PERFUSION; QUANTIFICATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s12350-020-02266-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Selection of optimal tracer activity for 82Rb PET is based on a trade-off between necessary count-statistics in the late static phase and detector saturation in the early blood-pool phase. Administered tracer activity recommended in prescribing information differs substantially from recommendations in current literature. The present study examines the effect on both absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and relative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) of reducing dose. Methods Forty patients were scanned twice on a PMT-based PET/CT (GE D690): At recommended activity (1110 MBq) and at either 740 or 370 MBq. MBF, MFR, total perfusion deficit (TPD) and ejection fractions (EF) were quantified. Results were compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots. Results Linear correlation between MBF at 1110 MBq at either reduced activity had anR(2) > 0.98. A small bias (+/- 5%-9%) was observed with opposite signs for 1110/740 and 1110/370. Limits of agreement for MBF were larger for 1110/370. MFR had a lower linear correlation (R-2 = 0.96), but wide limits of agreement especially for 1110/370. TPD and EF correlated well at 1110/740 (R-2 = 0.96 and 0.99, respectively), but large scatter was observed for 1110/370. Conclusion Reduction of the tracer activity to 740 MBq, significantly reduced dead-time correction factors, while still producing reliable static and gated images. However, despite large dead-time at 1110 MBq, no systematic bias on absolute MBF was observed compared to reduced activities.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 460
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Myocardial flow estimation using a truncated 82Rb PET acquisition
    Kolthammer, Jeffrey
    Muzic, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [42] Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow in Absolute Terms Using 82Rb PET Imaging The RUBY-10 Study
    Nesterov, Sergey V.
    Deshayes, Emmanuel
    Sciagra, Roberto
    Settimo, Leonardo
    Declerck, Jerome M.
    Pan, Xiao-Bo
    Yoshinaga, Keiichiro
    Katoh, Chietsugu
    Slomka, Piotr J.
    Germano, Guido
    Han, Chunlei
    Aalto, Ville
    Alessio, Adam M.
    Ficaro, Edward P.
    Lee, Benjamin C.
    Nekolla, Stephan G.
    Gwet, Kilem L.
    deKemp, Robert A.
    Klein, Ran
    Dickson, John
    Case, James A.
    Bateman, Timothy
    Prior, John O.
    Knuuti, Juhani M.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 7 (11) : 1119 - 1127
  • [43] Rest and stress 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging as a predictor of perioperative cardiac events in cancer patients
    Fox, Josef
    Gupta, Dipti
    Yu, Alice
    Gandikota, Neetha
    Larson, Steven
    Schoder, Heiko
    Strauss, H. William
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03)
  • [44] The utility of 82Rb PET for myocardial viability assessment: Comparison with perfusion-metabolism 82Rb-18F-FDG PET
    Moody, Jonathan B.
    Hiller, Keri M.
    Lee, Benjamin C.
    Poitrasson-Riviere, Alexis
    Corbett, James R.
    Weinberg, Richard L.
    Murthy, Venkatesh L.
    Ficaro, Edward P.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 374 - 386
  • [45] High-precision γ-ray spectroscopy of the cardiac PET imaging isotope 82Rb and its impact on dosimetry
    Nino, M. N.
    McCutchan, E. A.
    Smith, S. V.
    Lister, C. J.
    Greene, J. P.
    Carpenter, M. P.
    Muench, L.
    Sonzogni, A. A.
    Zhu, S.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2016, 93 (02)
  • [46] The utility of 82Rb PET for myocardial viability assessment: Comparison with perfusion-metabolism 82Rb-18F-FDG PET
    Jonathan B. Moody
    Keri M. Hiller
    Benjamin C. Lee
    Alexis Poitrasson-Rivière
    James R. Corbett
    Richard L. Weinberg
    Venkatesh L. Murthy
    Edward P. Ficaro
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019, 26 : 374 - 386
  • [47] Comparison a ong 82Rb PET/CT yocardial flow rese methods
    Van Tosh, Andrew
    Cao, J. Jane
    Votaw, John
    Cooke, Charles
    Palestro, Christopher
    Nichols, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60
  • [48] Quantitative 82Rb dynamic pet perfusion analysis with kinetic modeling for myocardial viability: Can we get away with just 82Rb perfusion kinetics?
    Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
    Parthiban Arumugam
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019, 26 : 387 - 390
  • [49] Quantitative 82Rb PET/CT:: Development and validation of myocardial perfusion database
    Santana, Cesar A.
    Folks, Russell D.
    Garcia, Ernest V.
    Verdes, Liudmila
    Sanyal, Rupan
    Hainer, Jon
    Di Carli, Marcelo F.
    Esteves, Fabio P.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (07) : 1122 - 1128
  • [50] Quantitative 82Rb dynamic pet perfusion analysis with kinetic modeling for myocardial viability: Can we get away with just 82Rb perfusion kinetics?
    Ananthasubramaniam, Karthik
    Arumugam, Parthiban
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 387 - 390