Understanding the Group Size Effect in Electronic Brainstorming

被引:44
|
作者
Paulus, Paul B. [1 ]
Kohn, Nicholas W. [3 ]
Arditti, Lauren E. [2 ]
Korde, Runa M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Psychol, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[3] Gen Dynam Informat Technol, San Antonio, TX USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
brainstorming; computer-mediated communication; creativity; IDEA GENERATION; PRODUCTIVITY LOSS; COGNITIVE STIMULATION; METAANALYSIS; INFORMATION; CREATIVITY; HEADS;
D O I
10.1177/1046496413479674
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A number of studies on electronic brainstorming have found that large electronic groups can facilitate the number of ideas generated relative to control groups of similar numbers of solitary performers (nominal groups). Thus far there is no clear evidence for the basis of this facilitative effect. The most likely explanation is that group members benefit from exposure to the wide range of ideas in large groups. Since most electronic brainstorming studies appear to divide the presented ideas into subfolders to avoid overloading participants with too many ideas, this practice may be important for demonstration of a benefit of exposure to a large number of ideas. The present study was designed to assess the role of number of ideas and number of folders on individual idea generation and to eliminate some alternative interpretations for the group size effect. Participants performed an idea generation task on computers while being exposed to either no ideas, 28 ideas, or 112 ideas. The 28 and 112 ideas were presented in either one, four, or eight folders. The results indicated that only the number of ideas factor was important for facilitating idea generation.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 352
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of visualizing participant contribution in electronic brainstorming
    Ivanov, Alex
    [J]. Creativity and Cognition 2007, CC2007 - Seeding Creativity: Tools, Media, and Environments, 2007,
  • [42] A tool for electronic brainstorming research: A software note
    Clapper, DL
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1996, 5 (02) : 137 - 141
  • [43] The Role of Time and Category Relatedness in Electronic Brainstorming
    Baruah, Jonali
    Paulus, Paul B.
    [J]. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2016, 47 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [44] An Empirical Study on Dynamic Process of Electronic Brainstorming
    Hui, Deng
    Zhang Pengzhu
    Jingle, Sun
    [J]. 2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 11828 - +
  • [45] Gamification and social comparison processes in electronic brainstorming
    Guegan, Jerome
    Buisine, Stephanie
    Nelson, Julien
    Vernier, Frederic
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GAMING AND VIRTUAL WORLDS, 2020, 13 (03): : 265 - 283
  • [46] Understanding Animal Group-Size Distributions
    Griesser, Michael
    Ma, Qi
    Webber, Simone
    Bowgen, Katharine
    Sumpter, David J. T.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08):
  • [47] INTER-GROUP UNDERSTANDING AND SIZE OF ORGANIZATION
    ALLEN, PT
    STEPHENSON, GM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1983, 21 (03) : 312 - 329
  • [48] Electronic Brainstorming and the effect to development systematic thinking skills for first medium students in computer
    Alhafidh, Mahmood Abdul Salam
    Albasso, Islam Kalid
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2015 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING (ECONF 2015), 2015, : 9 - 19
  • [49] Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming
    Brown, V
    Tumeo, M
    Larey, TS
    Paulus, PB
    [J]. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1998, 29 (04) : 495 - 526
  • [50] Individual and Group Brainstorming: Does the Question Matter?
    Goldenberg, Olga
    Wiley, Jennifer
    [J]. CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 31 (03) : 261 - 271