PRODUCTION OF A SOIL MAP ASOCIATING COMMON DIGITAL SOIL MAPPING TECHNIQUES WITH HAND DELINEATION OF SOIL MAPPING UNITS

被引:4
|
作者
Teske, Rodrigo [1 ]
Giasson, Elvio [2 ]
Bagatini, Tatiane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Agron, Programa Posgrad Ciencia Solo, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Agron, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO | 2015年 / 39卷 / 04期
关键词
soil maps; soil surveys; soil types; decision tree; soil profiles; KNOWLEDGE; PREDICTION; GIS;
D O I
10.1590/01000683rbcs20140285
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The production of soil maps through digital soil mapping (DSM) techniques may be hampered due to the lack of traditional reference soil maps. In these situations, the tacit knowledge of the field soil scientist can be used for manual delineation of soil mapping units (MUs) based on generation of a map of occurrence of soil types predicted by DSM. The objective of this study was to evaluate and to compare soil maps generated by two methods. One method, called "direct DSM", generates a map predicting soil MUs based on a model established with information from a traditional pedological reference map. The other established a predicting model through examination of morphological properties of 193 soil profiles for identification of soil types, generating a map that indicates the occurrence of soil types performed through manual delineation of MUs (based on changes in land surface features). Predictions were made using Simple Cart classification trees, correlating eight terrain variables with the occurrence of MUs identified by soil class names from the Brazilian Soil Classification System (Sistema Brasileiro de Classificacao de Solos). The accuracy of the maps was evaluated based on "field truth" (field verification of the soil type and comparison with that predicted on the map) and by agreement between the prediction maps generated and the reference map. When evaluated by "field truth", the accuracy of the map generated by the direct DSM method was 74 %, whereas the accuracy of the map generated by DSM with manual delineation was 79 %. Both methods showed satisfactory results, and the method with manual delineation and identification of soil types in some locations in the field had the advantage of not requiring reference soil maps for training prediction models.
引用
收藏
页码:950 / 959
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Digital soil mapping of soil properties for Korean soils
    Hong, S. Y.
    Kim, Y. H.
    Han, K. H.
    Hyun, B. K.
    Zhang, Y. S.
    Song, K. C.
    Minasny, B.
    McBratney, A. B.
    [J]. DIGITAL SOIL ASSESSMENTS AND BEYOND, 2012, : 435 - 438
  • [22] Mapping soil organic carbon stock change by soil monitoring and digital soil mapping at the landscape scale
    Ellili, Yosra
    Walter, Christian
    Michot, Didier
    Pichelin, Pascal
    Lemercier, Blandine
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2019, 351 : 1 - 8
  • [23] Benefits of hierarchical predictions for digital soil mapping-An approach to map bimodal soil pH
    Nussbaum, Madlene
    Zimmermann, Stephan
    Walthert, Lorenz
    Baltensweiler, Andri
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2023, 437
  • [24] A high resolution map of soil types and physical properties for Cyprus: A digital soil mapping optimization
    Camera, Corrado
    Zomeni, Zomenia
    Noller, Jay S.
    Zissimos, Andreas M.
    Christoforou, Irene C.
    Bruggeman, Adriana
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2017, 285 : 35 - 49
  • [25] Digital soil mapping algorithms and covariates for soil organic carbon mapping and their implications: A review
    Lamichhane, Sushil
    Kumar, Lalit
    Wilson, Brian
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2019, 352 : 395 - 413
  • [26] Harmonizing legacy soil data for digital soil mapping in Indonesia
    Sulaeman, Yiyi
    Minasny, Budiman
    McBratney, Alex B.
    Sarwani, Muhrizal
    Sutandi, Atang
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2013, 192 : 77 - 85
  • [27] Soil surveyor knowledge in digital soil mapping and assessment in Australia
    Bui, Elisabeth N.
    Searle, Ross D.
    Wilson, Peter R.
    Philip, Seonaid R.
    Thomas, Mark
    Brough, Dan
    Harms, Ben
    Hill, Jason, V
    Holmes, Karen
    Smolinski, Henry J.
    Van Gool, Dennis
    [J]. GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2020, 22
  • [28] Digital Soil Mapping from Conventional Field Soil Observations
    Balkovic, Juraj
    Rampasekova, Zuzana
    Hutar, Vladimir
    Sobocka, Jaroslava
    Skalsky, Rastislav
    [J]. SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 8 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [29] Updating Conventional Soil Maps through Digital Soil Mapping
    Yang, Lin
    Jiao, You
    Fahmy, Sherif
    Zhu, A-Xing
    Hann, Sheldon
    Burt, James E.
    Qi, Feng
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2011, 75 (03) : 1044 - 1053
  • [30] Digital soil mapping of a coastal acid sulfate soil landscape
    Huang, Jingyi
    Nhan, Terence
    Wong, Vanessa N. L.
    Johnston, Scott G.
    Lark, R. Murray
    Triantafilis, John
    [J]. SOIL RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (04) : 327 - 339