Extending the engineering trade-off analysis by integrating user preferences in conjoint analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Kowalewski, Sylvia [1 ]
Arning, Katrin [1 ]
Minwegen, Andreas [2 ]
Ziefle, Martina [1 ]
Ascheid, Gerd [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, HCI C, Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Commun Technol & Embedded Syst ICE, Aachen, Germany
关键词
Mobile communication; Technology acceptance model (TAM); User centered design; Trade-off analysis; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; EXTENSION; ADOPTION; USAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.010
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The ongoing technical improvements in architecture design with improved features of mobile or smart-phones do not automatically guarantee user acceptance, because technical and commercial aspects primarily drive the development of mobile communication systems and devices. Especially in early stages of technology development, user preferences and values are not adequately considered, which might even have a negative impact on acceptance issues. The aim of this study was the implementation of a quantified understanding of user needs in terms of values into the system design process of cell-phone processors. Moreover, we aimed for an extension of the engineering's trade-off analysis by using conjoint analysis in order to investigate trade-offs between specific device characteristics. Finally, our aim was the evaluation of empirically based user-oriented research methods. Results of the first study revealed that battery life, speech quality, signal quality and data-transmission rate are the most important device characteristics. Results from conjoint analysis indicated a clear trade-off between battery life and the three other characteristics. Moreover, this research demonstrated that technology acceptance research benefits considerably from an interdisciplinary and multi-method approach. Besides, implementing the users' preferences into early stages of the product development process offers several advantages concerning effectiveness as well as economic aspects of development. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2947 / 2955
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision
    Frank, R
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (04) : 954 - 954
  • [22] Reliability and Cost Trade-Off Analysis of a Microgrid
    Skowronska, Annette
    Gorsich, David G.
    Mourelatos, Zissimos
    [J]. SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING, 2018, 11 (04) : 285 - 292
  • [23] MULTICHIP SYSTEMS TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS TOOL
    SANDBORN, PA
    GHOSH, R
    DRAKE, K
    ABADIR, M
    BAL, L
    PARIKH, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC TESTING-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1994, 5 (2-3): : 207 - 218
  • [24] Automating trade-off analysis of security requirements
    Pasquale, Liliana
    Spoletini, Paola
    Salehie, Mazeiar
    Cavallaro, Luca
    Nuseibeh, Bashar
    [J]. REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (04) : 481 - 504
  • [25] Trade-off analysis for armament demonstration alternatives
    Jiang, Jiang
    Yang, Kewei
    Chen, Yingwu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND SYSTEM DYNAMICS: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND COMPLEX SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-10, 2007, : 889 - 895
  • [26] Automating trade-off analysis of security requirements
    Liliana Pasquale
    Paola Spoletini
    Mazeiar Salehie
    Luca Cavallaro
    Bashar Nuseibeh
    [J]. Requirements Engineering, 2016, 21 : 481 - 504
  • [27] Threshold Implementations of GIFT: A Trade-Off Analysis
    Jati, Arpan
    Gupta, Naina
    Chattopadhyay, Anupam
    Sanadhya, Somitra Kumar
    Chang, Donghoon
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, 2020, 15 : 2110 - 2120
  • [28] JIT VS WIP - A TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS
    SIPPER, D
    SHAPIRA, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1989, 27 (06) : 903 - 914
  • [29] A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision
    Christakis, DA
    Harvey, E
    Zerr, DM
    Feudtner, C
    Wright, JA
    Connell, FA
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2000, 105 (01) : 246 - 249
  • [30] AN APPROACH TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS BY TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS
    汪寿阳
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 1990, (01) : 1 - 15