Fuzzy Multi Criteria Approach for Sustainable Maintenance Evaluation in Rubber Industry

被引:11
|
作者
Amrina, Elita [1 ]
Yulianto, Ardy [1 ]
Kamil, Insannul [1 ]
机构
[1] Andalas Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, Padang 25163, Indonesia
关键词
analytic network process; evaluation; fuzzy; interpretive structural modeling; rubber industry; sustainable maintenance;
D O I
10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.067
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating sustainable maintenance in rubber industry. A literature study is conducted to identify the key performance indicators (KPIs) and then validated by academics and industry experts. As a result, three factors of economic, social, and environmental indicators (dividing into a total of thirteen indicators) are proposed as the KPIs for sustainable maintenance evaluation in rubber industry. Next, the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method is applied to determine the interrelationships of KPIs. The results identified four indicators of environmental factor as the most influencing KPIs, while six indicators of economic factor suggested as the most influenced KPIs. Finally, the Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) method is used to determine the importance weight of KPIs. The lighting and ventilation is regarded as the most important KPIs, followed by working environment, energy consumption, and emission. The proposed evaluation model is expected to assist the rubber industry in improving their sustainable maintenance performance. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 545
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selection of sustainable suppliers in the oil and gas industry using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Jermsittiparsert, K.
    Zahar, M.
    Sumarni, S.
    Voronkova, O. Y.
    Bakhvalov, S. Y.
    Akhmadeev, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (04): : 253 - 261
  • [42] A two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach for proactive maintenance strategy selection for manufacturing systems
    Desmond Eseoghene Ighravwe
    Sunday Ayoola Oke
    [J]. SN Applied Sciences, 2020, 2
  • [43] A two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach for proactive maintenance strategy selection for manufacturing systems
    Ighravwe, Desmond Eseoghene
    Oke, Sunday Ayoola
    [J]. SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 2 (10)
  • [44] Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach for the evaluation of sustainable photovoltaic farms locations
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Gamal, Abduallah
    ELkomy, Osama M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
  • [45] A fuzzy multi-objective approach for sustainable investments
    Bilbao-Terol, Amelia
    Arenas-Parra, Mar
    Canal-Fernandez, Veronica
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (12) : 10904 - 10915
  • [46] Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach for Supplier Evaluation in Fuzzy Environment
    Bhayana, Nidhi
    Gandhi, Kanika
    Jha, P. C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2015), VOL 2, 2016, 437 : 991 - 1009
  • [47] A systematic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for alternatives evaluation
    Peng, Jian-Gang
    Xia, Guang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2019, 70 (09) : 1490 - 1501
  • [48] A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach for the Evaluation of the Network Service Providers in Turkey
    Balli, Serkan
    Tuker, Mustafa
    [J]. INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 24 (04): : 693 - 699
  • [49] An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-criteria Approach for Evaluation of Energy Resources: A Case Study of Turkey
    Turan, Hasan Huseyin
    Unver, Umit
    Erbiyik, Hikmet
    [J]. ROLE OF EXERGY IN ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, : 283 - 296
  • [50] Supplier Selection and Evaluation Using Generalized Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Luu Huu Van
    Yu, Vincent F.
    Chou, Shuo-Yan
    Luu Quoc Dat
    [J]. 2016 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (KSE), 2016, : 31 - 36