Newly defined in vitro quality control ranges for oritavancin broth microdilution testing and impact of variation in testing parameters

被引:12
|
作者
Arhin, Francis F. [1 ]
Tomfohrde, Karla [2 ]
Draghi, Deborah C. [2 ]
Aranza, Mohana [2 ]
Parr, Thomas R., Jr. [1 ]
Sahm, Daniel F. [2 ]
Moeck, Gregory [1 ]
机构
[1] Targanta Therapeut Inc, St Laurent, PQ H4S 2A1, Canada
[2] Eurofins Medinet, Herndon, VA 20171 USA
关键词
oritavancin; polysorbate; 80; quality control;
D O I
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.05.009
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
A 9-laboratory M23-A2 quality control (QC) study was performed to evaluate reproducibility of oritavancin MICs against reference strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae using broth microdilution assays in the presence of polysorbate 80. Polysorbate 80 has previously been shown to be required for accurate measurement of oritavancin broth microdilution MICS. Greater than 95% of replicate results (n = 270/organism) fell within the following QC ranges (in micrograms per milliliter): S. aureus ATCC 292 13, 0.015 to 0.12; E. faecalis ATCC 29212, 0.008 to 0.03, and S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619, 0.001 to 0.004. Oritavancin MIC QC ranges were, thus, narrow and reproducible. Parameters affecting testing results in the presence of polysorbate 80 were also evaluated. Oritavancin MICs were equivalent to or within 1 doubling dilution of those obtained under standard Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute testing conditions, regardless of incubation time (IS, 24, or 48 h), Ca(2+) concentration, pH, or frozen panel storage tune (Lip to 6 months). (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 95
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MULTICENTER EVALUATION OF THE USE OF HAEMOPHILUS TEST MEDIUM FOR BROTH MICRODILUTION ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF STREPTOCOCCUS-PNEUMONIAE AND DEVELOPMENT OF QUALITY-CONTROL LIMITS
    JORGENSEN, JH
    DOERN, GV
    FERRARO, MJ
    KNAPP, CC
    SWENSON, JM
    WASHINGTON, JA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (04) : 961 - 966
  • [32] INVITRO EVALUATION OF AUGMENTIN BY BROTH MICRODILUTION AND DISK DIFFUSION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING - REGRESSION-ANALYSIS, TENTATIVE INTERPRETIVE CRITERIA, AND QUALITY-CONTROL LIMITS
    FUCHS, PC
    BARRY, AL
    THORNSBERRY, C
    GAVAN, TL
    JONES, RN
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1983, 24 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [33] Quality-control ranges for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by broth dilution of the Brachyspira hyodysenteriae type strain (ATCC 27164T)
    Pringle, M.
    Aarestrup, F. M.
    Bergsjo, B.
    Fossi, M.
    Jouy, E.
    Landen, A.
    Mevius, D.
    Perry, K.
    Teale, C.
    Thomson, J.
    Skrzypczak, T.
    Veldman, K.
    Franklin, A.
    MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE-MECHANISMS EPIDEMIOLOGY AND DISEASE, 2006, 12 (03): : 219 - 221
  • [34] In vitro susceptibility of bovine mastitis pathogens to a combination of penicillin and framycetin: Development of interpretive criteria for testing by broth microdilution and disk diffusion
    Pillar, C. M.
    Stoneburner, A.
    Shinabarger, D. L.
    Abbeloos, E.
    Goby, L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (10) : 6594 - 6607
  • [36] Development of Broth Microdilution MIC and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Quality Control Ranges for the Combination of Cefepime and the Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor Enmetazobactam
    Belley, Adam
    Huband, Michael D.
    Fedler, Kelley A.
    Watters, Amy A.
    Flamm, Robert K.
    Shapiro, Stuart
    Knechtle, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 57 (08)
  • [37] In-vitro Susceptibility Testing Methods for Ceftazidime-avibactam against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: Comparison with Reference Broth Microdilution Method
    Sharma, Bhawna
    Sreenivasan, Priya
    Angrup, Archana
    Kaur, Satinder
    Rana, Sudesh
    Kundu, Jyoti
    Biswal, Manisha
    Ray, Pallab
    CURRENT DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 18 (04) : 563 - 570
  • [38] Comparison of Disc Diffusion, Etest, and a Modified CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole against Madurella mycetomatis
    Nyuykonge, Bertrand
    van Amelsvoort, Lukas
    Eadie, Kimberly
    Fahal, Ahmed H.
    Verbon, Annelies
    van de Sande, Wendy
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 65 (09)
  • [39] Comparison of MIC Test Strip and Sensititre YeastOne with the CLSI and EUCAST Broth Microdilution Reference Methods for In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans
    Delma, Fatima Zohra
    Al-Hatmi, Abdullah M. S.
    Buil, Jochem B.
    van der Lee, Hein
    Tehupeiory-Kooreman, Marlou
    de Hoog, G. Sybren
    Meletiadis, Joseph
    Verweij, Paul E.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 64 (04)
  • [40] Comparison of RPMI and AM3 medium for in vitro susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Candida spp. by EUCAST broth microdilution method
    Dannaoui, E.
    Lortholary, O.
    Raoux, D.
    Hoinard, D.
    Dromer, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S567 - S568