A comparative analysis of arthroscopic double-bundle versus single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft

被引:23
|
作者
Jain, Vineet [1 ]
Goyal, Ankit [1 ]
Mohindra, Mukul [1 ]
Kumar, Rahul [1 ]
Joshi, Deepak [1 ]
Chaudhary, Deepak [1 ]
机构
[1] Safdarjang Hosp, Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll, Sports Injury Ctr, Delhi 110029, India
关键词
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Posterior cruciate ligament; Knee;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-016-2512-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Anatomically, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) consists of two bundles, i.e. anterolateral (AL) and posteromedial (PM) bundle. Single-bundle PCL (SBPCL) reconstruction remains most popular method of reconstruction, though double-bundle PCL (DBPCL) reconstruction is more anatomical. This study was done to analyse the clinical and functional outcome after both SBPCL and DBPCL reconstructions using autologous hamstring grafts. This was a retrospective study including patients who underwent either DBPCL or SBPCL reconstruction for chronic symptomatic PCL injury. Clinical, functional and radiological evaluation was done pre-operatively and 3 months post-operatively and thereafter at every 6-month interval. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included in the study. Pre-operative posterior translation was quantified by manual posterior drawer, KT 1000 measurement and stress radiography. Functional outcome was done using Lysholm and IKDC scores. MRI was done in all patients. Records of 40 patients were available with minimum follow-up of 24 months. Out of these, DBPCL reconstruction was done in 18 patients and SBPCL reconstruction was done in 22 patients. Four patients in DB (double-bundle PCL reconstruction) group and five in SB (single-bundle PCL reconstruction) group had more than grade I laxity by posterior drawer and on KT 1000 measurement DB group had average side-to-side difference of 1.78 mm and SB group 2.44 mm (p value = 0.0487). On functional assessment by Lysholm and IKDC score, there was significant improvement from pre-operative values in both the groups with no significant difference between the groups post-operatively. Stress radiography revealed significantly less post-translation in DB group as compared to SB group. Though DBPCL reconstruction results in less posterior laxity, there is no difference in functional outcome of SBPCL and DBPCL reconstructions. III.
引用
收藏
页码:1555 / 1561
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomechanical comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis
    Oh, Jin-Young
    Kim, Kun-Tae
    Park, Young-Jin
    Won, Hee-Chan
    Yoo, Jun-Il
    Moon, Dong-Kyu
    Cho, Sung-Hee
    Hwang, Sun-Chul
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [32] Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kong, Lingde
    Liu, Zhao
    Meng, Fei
    Shen, Yong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [33] Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated Single-Bundle Augmentation with Hamstring Autograft
    Yoon, Kyoung Ho
    Bae, Dae Kyung
    Cho, Seung Mok
    Park, Soo Yeon
    Lee, Jung Hwan
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (11): : 1265 - 1274
  • [34] Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Long-Term Functional Outcomes
    Anandan, Vicknesh
    Goh, Teik Chiang
    Zamri, Kamarul Syariza
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [35] Biomechanical comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis
    Jin-Young Oh
    Kun-Tae Kim
    Young-Jin Park
    Hee-Chan Won
    Jun-Il Yoo
    Dong-Kyu Moon
    Sung-Hee Cho
    Sun-Chul Hwang
    [J]. Knee Surgery & Related Research, 32
  • [36] Cost Analysis of Converting From Single-Bundle to Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Wright, Rick W.
    Matava, Matthew J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (04): : 683 - 687
  • [37] Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Assessment With Vertical Jump Test
    Ventura, Alberto
    Iori, Stefano
    Legnani, Claudio
    Terzaghi, Clara
    Borgo, Enrico
    Albisetti, Walter
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (07): : 1201 - 1210
  • [38] A Modest Proposal for a Clinical Trial on Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    D'Agostino, Ralph B., Jr.
    Lubowitz, James H.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    Poehling, Gary G.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (03): : 301 - 304
  • [39] Intraoperative comparisons of knee kinematics of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Plaweski, Stephane
    Grimaldi, Mathieu
    Courvoisier, Aurelien
    Wimsey, Simon
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2011, 19 (08) : 1277 - 1286
  • [40] Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:: a prospective, randomize clinical study
    Jarvela, Timo
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (05) : 500 - 507