Confidence intervals and p-values in urology. Interpretation and misinterpretation

被引:0
|
作者
Rink, M. [1 ,2 ]
Kluth, L. A. [1 ,2 ]
Shariat, S. F. [2 ,3 ]
Dahlem, R. [1 ]
Fisch, M. [1 ]
Dahm, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Klin & Poliklin Urol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[3] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Div Med Oncol, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
UROLOGE | 2013年 / 52卷 / 04期
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Significance; statistical; Probability; Therapy success; Misinterpretation; CLINICAL-TRIALS;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-013-3148-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Confidence intervals and p-values are widely used in the urological literature to describe and interpret outcomes. However, several readers, authors and reviewers are unfamiliar with the true interpretation of these values. P-values determine statistical significance of data. Confidence intervals characterize a range of values in which the true effect size is suggested to be with a given degree of certainty. An independent but complementary interpretation of both values is important in studies with and without statistical significance. Based on a clinical case scenario this article discusses the interpretation as well as common pitfalls in interpretation of p-values and confidence intervals. An accurate assessment of these statistical cornerstones is fundamental for a correct interpretation of the urological literature and thus important aspects of evidence-based urology.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 548
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条