Motion in the Unstable Cervical Spine When Transferring a Patient Positioned Prone to a Spine Board

被引:11
|
作者
Conrad, Bryan P. [1 ]
Marchese, Diana L. [2 ]
Rechtine, Glenn R. [3 ]
Prasarn, Mark [4 ]
Del Rossi, Gianluca [5 ]
Horodyski, MaryBeth H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Orthopaed, Gainesville, FL 32607 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[3] Bay Pines VA Hlth Care Syst, Bay Pines, FL USA
[4] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ S Florida, Dept Orthopaed, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
injuries; transfer techniques; logroll; TABLE-TURNING METHODS; GLOBAL INSTABILITY MODEL; HOSPITAL BED TRANSFERS; JACKSON-TABLE; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; LOG ROLL; ORTHOSES; EFFICACY; MANEUVER;
D O I
10.4085/1062-6050-48.5.07
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Two methods have been proposed to transfer an individual in the prone position to a spine board. Researchers do not know which method provides the best immobilization. Objective: To determine if motion produced in the unstable cervical spine differs between 2 prone logrolling techniques and to evaluate the effect of equipment on the motion produced during prone logrolling. Design: Crossover study. Setting: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Tests were performed on 5 fresh cadavers (3 men, 2 women; age = 83 +/- 8 years, mass = 61.2 +/- 14.1 kg). Main Outcome Measure(s): Three-dimensional motions were recorded during 2 prone logroll protocols (pull, push) in cadavers with an unstable cervical spine. Three equipment conditions were evaluated: football shoulder pads and helmet, rigid cervical collar, and no equipment. The mean range of motion was calculated for each test condition. Results: The pull technique produced 16% more motion than the push technique in the lateral-bending angulation direction (F-1,F-4 = 19.922, P = .01, eta(2) = 0.833). Whereas the collar-only condition and, to a lesser extent, the football-shoulder-pads-and-helmet condition demonstrated trends toward providing more stability than the no-equipment condition, we found no differences among equipment conditions. We noted an interaction between technique and equipment, with the pull maneuver performed without equipment producing more anteroposterior motion than the push maneuver in any of the equipment conditions. Conclusions: We saw a slight difference in the motion measured during the 2 prone logrolling techniques tested, with less lateral-bending and anteroposterior motion produced with the logroll push than the pull technique. Therefore, we recommend adopting the push technique as the preferred spine-boarding maneuver when a patient is found in the prone position. Researchers should continue to seek improved methods for performing prone spine-board transfers to further decrease the motion produced in the unstable spine.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 803
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] UNSTABLE DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS OF THE CERVICAL-SPINE
    DEBURGE, A
    MAZDA, K
    GUIGUI, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77B (01): : 122 - 125
  • [22] THE EFFECT OF CRICOID PRESSURE ON THE UNSTABLE CERVICAL SPINE
    Prasarn, Mark L.
    Horodyski, MaryBeth
    Schneider, Prism
    Wendling, Adam
    Hagberg, Carin A.
    Rechtine, Glenn R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (03): : 427 - 432
  • [23] UNSTABLE OCCULT CERVICAL-SPINE FRACTURE
    MACE, SE
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (12) : 1373 - 1375
  • [24] UNSTABLE OCCULT CERVICAL-SPINE FRACTURE
    ROBERGE, RJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (05) : 868 - 868
  • [25] EFFECT OF CERVICAL-SPINE MOTION ON THE NEUROFORAMINAL DIMENSIONS OF HUMAN CERVICAL-SPINE
    YOO, JU
    ZOU, D
    EDWARDS, WT
    BAYLEY, J
    YUAN, HA
    [J]. SPINE, 1992, 17 (10) : 1131 - 1136
  • [26] Reliability of the Cervical Spine Device for the Assessment of Cervical Spine Range of Motion in Asymptomatic Participants
    Mangone, Massimiliano
    Bernetti, Andrea
    Germanotta, Marco
    Di Sipio, Enrica
    Razzano, Cristina
    Ioppolo, Francesco
    Santilli, Valter
    Venditto, Teresa
    Paoloni, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 41 (04) : 342 - 349
  • [27] CERVICAL SPINE MOTION DURING EXTRICATION
    Engsberg, Jack R.
    Standeven, John W.
    Shurtleff, Timothy L.
    Eggars, Jessica L.
    Shafer, Jeffery S.
    Naunheim, Rosanne S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (01): : 122 - 127
  • [28] RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION OF CERVICAL SPINE IN MOTION
    OCHS, CW
    ROMINE, JS
    OLDERSHA.JB
    CLOOS, DW
    [J]. US NAVY MEDICINE, 1974, 64 (01): : 21 - 29
  • [29] Cervical spine motion during swallowing
    Kojiro Mekata
    Tomoyuki Takigawa
    Jun Matsubayashi
    Yasuhiro Hasegawa
    Yasuo Ito
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 2558 - 2563
  • [30] Motion preservation in cervical spine: review
    Kasliwal, M. K.
    Traynelis, V. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 56 (01) : 13 - 25