Substance Abuse Treatment Patients in Housing Programs Respond to Contingency Management Interventions

被引:23
|
作者
Rash, Carla J. [1 ]
Alessi, Sheila M. [1 ]
Petry, Nancy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCONN Hlth, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr Behav Hlth, Dept Med, Farmington, CT USA
关键词
Incentives; Homelessness; Unstable housing; Non-permanent housing; Sober house; Transitional housing; Recovery housing; INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS; METHADONE-MAINTENANCE; IMPROVES OUTCOMES; COCAINE ABUSERS; USE DISORDERS; HOMELESS; ABSTINENCE; ATTENDANCE; DEPENDENCE; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsat.2016.07.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Use of homeless and transitional housing (e.g., recovery homes) programs can be associated with success in substance abuse treatment, perhaps because many of these programs encourage or mandate sobriety. In this study, we examined whether contingency management (CM) protocols that use tangible incentives for submission of drug-free specimens or other specific behaviors are effective for treatment-seeking substance abusers whose behavior may also be shaped by housing programs. Of 355 participants in randomized trials of CM, 56 (16%) reported using transitional housing during the 12-week treatment period. Main and interaction effects of housing status and treatment condition were evaluated for the primary substance abuse treatment outcomes: a) longest duration of abstinence from alcohol, cocaine, and opioids, b) percentage of samples submitted that were negative for these substances, and c) treatment retention. After controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, those who accessed housing programs submitted a higher percentage of negative samples (75%) compared to those who did not access housing programs (67%). Housing status groups did not differ in terms of longest duration of abstinence (accessed housing: M = 3.1 weeks, SE = 0.6; did not access housing: M = 3.9 weeks, SE = 03) or retention in substance abuse treatment (accessed housing: M = 6.4 weeks, SE = 0.6; did not access housing: M = 6.6 weeks, SE = 0.3). Regardless of housing status, CM was associated with longer durations of abstinence and treatment retention. No interactive effects of housing and treatment condition were observed (p>.05). Results suggest that those who accessed housing programs during substance abuse treatment benefit from CM to a comparable degree as their peers who did not use such programs. These effects suggest that CM remains appropriate for those accessing housing in community-based programs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] USING THE EXPERIENCE SAMPLING METHOD IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT
    Husky, Mathilde M.
    Mazure, Carolyn M.
    Carroli, Kathleen M.
    Barry, Danielle
    Petry, Nancy M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2008, 41 (04) : 635 - 644
  • [22] Contingency management reinforcement procedures for adolescent substance abuse
    Kaminer, Y
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 39 (10): : 1324 - 1326
  • [23] SELECTION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS
    不详
    PEDIATRICS, 1990, 86 (01) : 139 - 140
  • [24] Substance Abuse Treatment Programs' Data Management Capacity: an Exploratory Study
    Wisdom, Jennifer P.
    Ford, James H., II
    Wise, Meg
    Mackey, Deirdre
    Green, Carla A.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES & RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (02): : 249 - 264
  • [25] Patterns of organization and management in private and public substance abuse treatment programs
    Roman, Paul M.
    Ducharme, Lori J.
    Knudsen, Hannah K.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2006, 31 (03) : 235 - 243
  • [26] Substance Abuse Treatment Programs’ Data Management Capacity: an Exploratory Study
    Jennifer P. Wisdom
    James H. Ford
    Meg Wise
    Deirdre Mackey
    Carla A. Green
    The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 2011, 38 : 249 - 264
  • [27] Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: Implications for dissemination
    Kirby, Kimberly C.
    Benishek, Lois A.
    Dugosh, Karen Leggett
    Kerwin, MaryLouise E.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2006, 85 (01) : 19 - 27
  • [28] Contingency Management for Substance Abuse Treatment: A Guide to Implementing This Evidence-Based Practice
    Bride, Brian
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE IN THE ADDICTIONS, 2013, 13 (04) : 438 - 440
  • [29] Contingency Management for Substance Abuse Treatment: A Guide to Implementing This Evidence-Based Practice
    Hays, Lon R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2012, 21 (02): : 186 - 187
  • [30] CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT FOR ATTENDANCE TO GROUP SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT ADMINISTERED BY CLINICIANS IN COMMUNITY CLINICS
    Ledgerwood, David M.
    Alessi, Sheila M.
    Hanson, Tressa
    Godley, Mark D.
    Petry, Nancy M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2008, 41 (04) : 517 - 526