A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level

被引:26
|
作者
Sternberg, Rolf [1 ]
von Bloh, Johannes [1 ]
Coduras, Alicia [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Econ & Cultural Geog, Schneiderberg 50, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[2] Inst Opinometre, Av Josep Tarradellas 8, Barcelona 08029, Spain
[3] London Business Sch, GERA, Regents Pk, London NW1 4SA, England
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGRAPHIE | 2019年 / 63卷 / 2-4期
关键词
entrepreneurial eco-system; entrepreneurship theory; region; regional growth; SYSTEM; START; POLICY; GEM;
D O I
10.1515/zfw-2018-0014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The term 'entrepreneurial eco-system' (EES) currently belongs to the most popular ones in economic geography - and in the practice of start-up support policies in many countries, too. Due to its exclusively positive connotations the usage of this term creates unrealistic hopes among entrepreneurship support practitioners. Scholars may be reminded to previous supposed panaceas of regional economic policies like clusters, 'creative class' members or high-tech industries. As for these predecessors as well, the concept is "fuzzy" (Markusen 1999), the available empirics are "scanty" (ibid.) and its perception among policymakers is oversimplified, exclusively positive and partially naive. To a degree, this is a consequence of an extremely unclear definition of what is meant by an EES. The undertheorization of the EES discourse, as observed by some scholars, is not due to a lack of conceptual approaches per se, but due to a lack of convincing, theoretically strong approaches. In fact, the majority of the EES publications is conceptual or even theoretical, usually without any serious empirical underpinning. From our perspective the latter has one important consequence: EES theory is weak because there is a lack of representative, comprehensive and sophisticated empirical studies, indicators and methods to measure EES. This paper provides a unique attempt to measure EES at the sub-national level of regions, that is, from our perspective, the most appropriate spatial level to identify and measure (and theorize) EES as the regional entrepreneurship literature provides striking evidence in favor of entrepreneurship as being primarily a regional (or local) event. Our paper contributes to the current EES debate by arguing that a robust empirical measurement of various EES at the sub-national level may help to improve the quality of EES theory. We propose to start with Erik S tam's interpretation of an EES based upon ten "conditions" for whom we develop specific variables for application in concrete data collection exercises in different regions. We develop an overall EES index as well as subnational indices for each of the ten conditions. We also propose a method to care for the various weighting problems to be solved. Our attempt has been successfully pretested in Germany and Spain and has meanwhile entered a more ambitious pilot phase in 2018. One of this paper's aims is to get feedback from scholars studying EES regarding our proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 117
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Traditional and digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: a framework of differences and similarities
    Lado, Alexandre
    Castro-Abancens, Ignacio
    Moreno-Menendez, Ana M.
    Casillas, Jose C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [22] From sustainability to thrivability: A novel framework for entrepreneurial ecosystems
    Sara Moggi
    Paul Pierce
    Nicole Bernardi
    [J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2022, 18 : 829 - 853
  • [23] Development of a multi-dimensional measure for assessing entrepreneurial ecosystems
    Liguori, Eric
    Bendickson, Josh
    Solomon, Shelby
    McDowell, William C.
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (1-2): : 7 - 21
  • [24] The 5D's: A New Framework to Understand and Overcome Interpersonal and Inter-institutional Challenges Facilitating Growth of Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
    Pogue, Gregory P.
    Spinuzzi, Clay
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE, PROCOMM, 2022, : 397 - 404
  • [25] Assessing the role of FinTech in entrepreneurial ecosystems at the international level
    Khatami, Fahimeh
    Cagno, Enrico
    Smrcka, Lubos
    Rozsa, Zoltan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [26] Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes
    Nieth, L.
    Benneworth, P.
    Charles, D.
    Fonseca, L.
    Rodrigues, C.
    Salomaa, M.
    Stienstra, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2018, 26 (11) : 2147 - 2166
  • [27] Entrepreneurial ecosystems, agency and regional development: Emergence and new path creation in the Cardiff city region
    Huggins, Robert
    Munday, Max
    Thompson, Piers
    Xu, Chen
    [J]. LOCAL ECONOMY, 2023, 38 (06): : 538 - 561
  • [28] The road to evidence based applicable policies for regional entrepreneurial ecosystems
    von Bloh, Johannes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 10 (01) : 59 - 77
  • [29] Technology and talent: capturing the role of universities in regional entrepreneurial ecosystems
    Huang-Saad, Aileen
    Duval-Couetil, Nathalie
    Park, Jongho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISING COMMUNITIES-PEOPLE AND PLACES IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, 2018, 12 (02) : 92 - 116
  • [30] Entrepreneurial ecosystems and social network centrality: the power of regional dealmakers
    Pittz, Thomas G.
    White, Rebecca
    Zoller, Ted
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2021, 56 (04) : 1273 - 1286