Is the nursing work index measuring up? Moving beyond estimating reliability to testing validity

被引:46
|
作者
Cummings, GG
Hayduk, L
Estabrooks, CA
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Knowledge Utilizat Studies Program, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Sociol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
instruments; methodology; model testing; nursing practice environment; Nursing Work Index; structural equation modeling;
D O I
10.1097/00006199-200603000-00003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background., The Nursing Work Index (NWI) provided the foundation for three published instruments, each presented as a valid measure of the nursing practice environment. Aiken and Patrician [Aiken, L. H., & Patrician, P. A. (2000). Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: The Revised Nursing Work Index. Nursing Research, 49, 146-153] revised the NWI to the Revised Nursing Work Index (NWI-R), reporting four conceptually derived subscales. Lake [Lake, E. T. (2002). Development of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. Research in Nursing and Health, 25, 176-188] used factor analysis to empirically derive five subscales with a composite overarching practice environment factor. Estabrooks et al. [Estabrooks, C. A., Tourangeau, A. E., Humphrey, C. K., Hesketh, K. L., Giovannetti, P., Thomson, D., et al. (2002). Measuring the hospital practice environment: A Canadian context. Research in Nursing and Health, 25, 256-268] reported a single empirically derived factor solution that represented the nursing practice environment. Objective: To examine the validity of three instruments (based on the NWI) as measures of the nursing practice environment. Methods: The measurement models underlying the three instruments were reconstructed from the information provided by each author in published manuscripts and then were estimated using structural equation modeling (SEM), the chi-square test of model fit, and data from the 1998 Canadian Nurse Survey. Results: Each of the three underlying measurement models was factor analytic in design (multiple indicators of each concept) and failed significantly when compared with the data (Aiken & Patrician; chi(2) = 939.12, p < .001, df = 50; Lake, 2 17,872.73, p < .001, df = 319; Estabrooks et al., chi(2) 38,590.29, p < .001). This lack of model fit with the data raises questions about the validity of these instruments as measures of the nursing practice environment. Discussion: The nursing practice environment is complex and has been examined inadequately by factor-analytic approaches, largely because insufficient attention has been paid to implicit underlying theory. The development and testing of robust theory using powerful research methods available to examine causal relationships in complex theoretical models will advance understanding of constructs such as the nursing practice environment.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 93
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Construct validity and reliability of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index for Queensland nurses
    Parker, Deborah
    Tuckett, Anthony
    Eley, Robert
    Hegney, Desley
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (04) : 352 - 358
  • [2] Reliability and validity of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index for Japanese hospital nurses
    Ogata, Yasuko
    Sasaki, Miki
    Yumoto, Yoshie
    Yonekura, Yuki
    Nagano, Midori
    Kanda, Katsuya
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2018, 5 (03): : 362 - 369
  • [3] Measuring Nursing Workarounds Tests of the Reliability and Validity of a Tool
    Halbesleben, Jonathon R. B.
    Rathert, Cheryl
    Bennett, Sally F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 43 (01): : 50 - 55
  • [4] Validity and reliability of the work ability index (WAI) in nurses' work
    Almeida da Silva Junior, Sergio Henrique
    Godoi Vasconcelos, Ana Gloria
    Griep, Rosane Harter
    Rotenberg, Lucia
    [J]. CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2011, 27 (06): : 1077 - 1087
  • [5] Testing the Reliability and Validity of the Nursing Activities Score in Critical Care Nursing
    Stafseth, Siv K.
    Tonnessen, Tor Inge
    Diep, Lien My
    Fagerstrom, Lisbeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2018, 26 (01) : 142 - 162
  • [6] Construct Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index for Korean Nurses
    Cho, Eunhee
    Choi, Mona
    Kim, Eun-Young
    Yoo, Il Young
    Lee, Nam-Ju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2011, 41 (03) : 325 - 332
  • [7] Reliability and validity testing of the ASSIST functional performance index
    Fairman, A. D.
    Walko, P. Foschi
    Ding, D.
    Morris, L.
    Boateng, J.
    Murphy, K.
    Terhorst, L.
    [J]. ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2023,
  • [8] Reliability and validity testing of the revised craniomandibular index.
    Pehling, JP
    Fricton, JR
    Look, J
    Schiffman, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 112 - 112
  • [9] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE WORK ABILITY INDEX QUESTIONNAIRE IN NURSE'S WORK
    da Silva Junior, S. H. A.
    Vasconcelos, A. G. G.
    Griep, R. H.
    Rotenberg, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2011, 65 : A457 - A458
  • [10] Measuring Reliability and Validity Instruments of Work Environment towards Quality Work Life
    Razak, Norfadzilah Abdul
    Ma'amor, Hairunnisa
    Hassan, Narehan
    [J]. FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MARKETING AND RETAILING (5TH INCOMAR) 2015, 2015, 37 : 520 - 528