Measuring Nursing Workarounds Tests of the Reliability and Validity of a Tool

被引:25
|
作者
Halbesleben, Jonathon R. B. [1 ]
Rathert, Cheryl [2 ]
Bennett, Sally F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Management & Mkt, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Hlth Management & Informat, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Robert Packer Hosp, Guthrie Healthcare Syst, Dept Nursing Educ & Res, Sayre, PA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION | 2013年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词
PATIENT SAFETY; WORK-AROUNDS; HEALTH-CARE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1097/NNA.0b013e31827860ff
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate a new tool to measure nursing workarounds. BACKGROUND: Workarounds are situations where one experiences a block in workflow and, rather than complete the work process as intended, creates an idiosyncratic solution to get around the block. There are limited options for validated measures of workarounds for researchers and administrators. METHODS: To validate the tool, we conducted a survey of registered nurses that included the newly developed tool of workarounds, and measures of deviance and job crafting. RESULTS: We found evidence for the content, factorial, discriminant, and criterion-related validity of the new workaround tool. Furthermore, the tool demonstrated adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Interest in workarounds has been rapidly growing; however, high-quality research in this area has been limited by an inability to validly measure workarounds. This study represents an important step in fostering new research in workarounds.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 55
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Nowotny Hope Scale - A nursing tool for measuring hope in cancer patients
    Rustoen, T
    Moum, T
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 1997, 11 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [2] Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Climate, Health, and Nursing Tool
    Jeong, Da Woon
    Kim, Gwang Suk
    Park, Min Kyung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2022, 52 (02) : 173 - 186
  • [3] The validity and reliability of a tool for measuring educational innovative thinking competencies
    Morad, Sigal
    Ragonis, Noa
    Barak, Miri
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2021, 97
  • [4] Measuring individualized nursing care: assessment of reliability and validity of three scales
    Suhonen, Riitta
    Schmidt, Lee A.
    Radwin, Laurel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 59 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [5] Reliability and validity tests of an evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index
    Ohura, Tomoko
    Ishizaki, Tatsuro
    Higashi, Takahiro
    Konishi, Kentaro
    Ishiguro, Rika
    Nakanishi, Kosuke
    Shah, Surya
    Nakayama, Takeo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 18 (08): : 422 - 428
  • [6] Swedish version of measuring cultural awareness in nursing students: Validity and reliability test
    Hadziabdic E.
    Safipour J.
    Bachrach-Lindström M.
    Hultsjö S.
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 15 (1)
  • [7] Measuring disability in nursing home residents: Validity and reliability of a newly developed instrument
    Valk, M
    Post, MWM
    Cools, HJM
    Schrijvers, GAJP
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2001, 56 (03): : P187 - P191
  • [8] The Validity and Reliability of the Constructs of Pain Management-Measuring Tool for Incurable Patients
    Shohani, Masoumeh
    Tavan, Hamed
    [J]. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 20 (09)
  • [9] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF PERSONALITY TESTS
    Stocker, Bernhard
    [J]. 12TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL BATA CONFERENCE FOR PH.D. STUDENTS AND YOUNG RESEARCHERS (DOKBAT), 2016, : 354 - 360
  • [10] Reliability and validity of diagnostic tests
    Kyriacou, DN
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (04) : 404 - 405