Design and analysis of group sequential clinical trials with multiple primary endpoints

被引:24
|
作者
Kosorok, MR [1 ]
Shi, YJ [1 ]
DeMets, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
alpha-spending function; beta-spending function; multivariate outcomes; sample size; time-to-event data;
D O I
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00146.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In many phase III clinical trials, it is desirable to separately assess the treatment effect on two or more primary endpoints. Consider the MERIT-HF study, where two endpoints of primary interest were tune to death and the earliest of time to first hospitalization or death (The International Steering Committee on Behalf of the MERIT-HF Study Group, 1997, American Journal of Cardiology 80[9B], 54J-58J). It is possible that treatment has no effect on death but a beneficial effect on first hospitalization time, or it has a detrimental effect on death but no effect on hospitalization. A good clinical trial design should permit early stopping as soon as the treatment effect on both endpoints becomes clear. Previous work in this area has not resolved how to stop the study early when one or more endpoints have no treatment effect or how to assess and control the many possible error rates for concluding wrong hypotheses. In this article, we develop a general methodology for group sequential clinical trials with multiple primary endpoints. This method uses a global alpha-spending function to control the overall type I error and a multiple decision rule to control error rates for concluding wrong alternative hypotheses. The method is demonstrated with two simulated examples based on the MERIT-HF study.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 145
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of Group Randomized Trials with Multiple Binary Endpoints and Small Number of Groups
    Lee, Ji-Hyun
    Schell, Michael J.
    Roetzheim, Richard
    PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (10):
  • [42] Considerations on Testing Secondary Endpoints in Group Sequential Design
    Li, Xiaoming
    Wulfsohn, Michael S.
    Koch, Gary G.
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 9 (04): : 333 - 337
  • [43] Clinical trials of novel and targeted therapies: Endpoints, trial design, and analysis
    Surnan, Vera J.
    Dueck, Amylou
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2008, 26 (05) : 439 - 444
  • [44] Analysis and Design of Clinical Trials Using Additive Hazards Survival Endpoints
    McDaniel, Lee S.
    Yu, Menggang
    Chappell, Rick
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 11 (03): : 274 - 282
  • [45] Design and Endpoints of Clinical Trials, Current and Future
    Sherman, Morris
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2019, 64 (04) : 1050 - 1057
  • [46] Analysis and design of randomised clinical trials involving competing risks endpoints
    Tai, Bee-Choo
    Wee, Joseph
    Machin, David
    TRIALS, 2011, 12
  • [47] Analysis and design of randomised clinical trials involving competing risks endpoints
    Bee-Choo Tai
    Joseph Wee
    David Machin
    Trials, 12
  • [48] Clinical trials: design, endpoints and interpretation of outcomes
    Megan Othus
    Mei-Jie Zhang
    Robert Peter Gale
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2022, 57 : 338 - 342
  • [49] American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Endpoints Conference: Design and Endpoints for Clinical Trials in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
    Silveira, Marina G.
    Brunt, Elizabeth M.
    Heathcote, Jenny
    Gores, Gregory J.
    Lindor, Keith D.
    Mayo, Marlyn J.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 52 (01) : 349 - 359
  • [50] Clinical trials: design, endpoints and interpretation of outcomes
    Othus, Megan
    Zhang, Mei-Jie
    Gale, Robert Peter
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 57 (03) : 338 - 342