Waterpipe tobacco products: nicotine labelling versus nicotine delivery

被引：39

作者：

Vansickel, Andrea R. ^{[1
]}

Shihadeh, Alan ^{[2
]}

Eissenberg, Thomas ^{[3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Inst Drug & Alcohol Studies, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA

[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Mech Engn, Beirut, Lebanon

[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Inst Drug & Alcohol Studies, Dept Psychol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA

[4] Syrian Ctr Tobacco Studies, Aleppo, Syria

来源：

TOBACCO CONTROL | 2012年 / 21卷 / 03期

关键词：

POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; MAINSTREAM SMOKE AEROSOL; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; NARGHILE WATERPIPE; TOXICANT EXPOSURE; PIPE; BELIEFS;

D O I：

10.1136/tc.2010.042416

中图分类号：

R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background Waterpipe tobacco package labelling typically indicates "0.0% tar" and "0.05% or 0.5% nicotine". Objective To determine the extent to which nicotine labeling is related to nicotine delivery. Methods 110 waterpipe smokers engaged in a 45-minute waterpipe smoking session. Puff topography and plasma nicotine were measured. Three waterpipe tobacco brands were used: Nakhla (0.5% nicotine), Starbuzz (0.05% nicotine), and Al Fakher (0.05% nicotine). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Results Topography did not differ across brands. Peak plasma nicotine varied significantly across brands. Al Fakher had the highest nicotine delivery (11.4 ng/ml) followed by Nakhla (9.8 ng/ml) and Starbuzz (5.8 ng/ml). Conclusions Nicotine labelling on waterpipe tobacco products does not reflect delivery; smoking a brand with a "0.05% nicotine" label led to greater plasma nicotine levels than smoking a brand with a "0.5% nicotine" label. Waterpipe tobacco products should be labelled in a manner that does not mislead consumers.

引用

页码：377 / 379

页数：3

共 50 条

[41] Nicotine Absorption From Seven Current Nicotine Replacement Products and a New Wide-Bore Nicotine Delivery Device
McEwen, Andy
West, Robert
Gaiger, Maria
[J]. JOURNAL OF SMOKING CESSATION, 2008, 3 (02) : 117 - 123
[42] International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey
Berlin, Ivan
Jacot-Sadowski, Isabelle
Humair, Jean-Paul
Cornuz, Jacques
[J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
[43] EFFECTIVENESS OF NICOTINE PATCH AND NICOTINE GUM AS INDIVIDUAL VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENTS FOR TOBACCO WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS
FAGERSTROM, KO
SCHNEIDER, NG
LUNELL, E
[J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 111 (03) : 271 - 277
[44] The waterpipe: A new way of hooking youth on nicotine
Maziak, Wasim
[J]. NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 2015, 49 : 141 - 141
[45] Small pouches, but high nicotine doses-nicotine delivery and acute effects after use of tobacco-free nicotine pouches
Mallock-Ohnesorg, Nadja
Rabenstein, Andrea
Stoll, Yvonne
Gertzen, Marcus
Rieder, Benedikt
Malke, Sebastian
Burgmann, Nestor
Laux, Peter
Pieper, Elke
Schulz, Thomas
Franzen, Klaas
Luch, Andreas
Ruether, Tobias
[J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
[46] Strategies to Reduce Illicit Trade of Regular Nicotine Tobacco Products After Introduction of a Low-Nicotine Tobacco Product Standard
Ribisl, Kurt M.
Hatsukami, Dorothy K.
Huang, Jidong
Williams, Rebecca S.
Donny, Eric C.
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 109 (07) : 1007 - 1014
[47] The association between nicotine stomatitis and waterpipe smoking
Dashti, Hussain
Sundaram, Devipriya
[J]. TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2024, 22 : 1 - 9
[48] NICOTINE DELIVERY
FOX, CH
[J]. NATURE, 1984, 307 (5948) : 205 - 205
[49] The degree of nicotine dependence among users of different tobacco and nicotine products in Madinah City, Saudi Arabia
Almutairi, Rami M.
Al-Dubai, Sami A. R.
Almutairi, Mai M.
Alharbi, Hani H.
Alshlahi, Hatim M.
Albadrani, Muayad S.
[J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2023, 30 (01): : 30 - 36
[50] Why Britain needs a nicotine regulation authority - To bring consistency and regulation to tobacco and alternative nicotine products
Britton, J
McNeill, A
[J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294): : 1077 - 1078

← 1 2 3 4 5 →