Waterpipe tobacco products: nicotine labelling versus nicotine delivery

被引:39
|
作者
Vansickel, Andrea R. [1 ]
Shihadeh, Alan [2 ]
Eissenberg, Thomas [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Inst Drug & Alcohol Studies, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Mech Engn, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Inst Drug & Alcohol Studies, Dept Psychol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[4] Syrian Ctr Tobacco Studies, Aleppo, Syria
关键词
POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; MAINSTREAM SMOKE AEROSOL; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; NARGHILE WATERPIPE; TOXICANT EXPOSURE; PIPE; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1136/tc.2010.042416
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Waterpipe tobacco package labelling typically indicates "0.0% tar" and "0.05% or 0.5% nicotine". Objective To determine the extent to which nicotine labeling is related to nicotine delivery. Methods 110 waterpipe smokers engaged in a 45-minute waterpipe smoking session. Puff topography and plasma nicotine were measured. Three waterpipe tobacco brands were used: Nakhla (0.5% nicotine), Starbuzz (0.05% nicotine), and Al Fakher (0.05% nicotine). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Results Topography did not differ across brands. Peak plasma nicotine varied significantly across brands. Al Fakher had the highest nicotine delivery (11.4 ng/ml) followed by Nakhla (9.8 ng/ml) and Starbuzz (5.8 ng/ml). Conclusions Nicotine labelling on waterpipe tobacco products does not reflect delivery; smoking a brand with a "0.05% nicotine" label led to greater plasma nicotine levels than smoking a brand with a "0.5% nicotine" label. Waterpipe tobacco products should be labelled in a manner that does not mislead consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 379
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of nicotine delivery and uptake in users of various tobacco/nicotine products
    Scherer, Gerhard
    Muetze, Janina
    Pluym, Nikola
    Scherer, Max
    [J]. CURRENT RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 3
  • [2] Application of ToxTracker for the toxicological assessment of tobacco and nicotine delivery products
    Smart, David E.
    Bozhilova, Stela
    Miazzi, Fabio
    Haswell, Linsey E.
    Gaca, Marianna D.
    Thorne, David
    Breheny, Damien
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 358 : 59 - 68
  • [3] Waterpipe tobacco smoking: what is the evidence that it supports nicotine/tobacco dependence?
    Aboaziza, Eiman
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2015, 24 : 44 - 53
  • [4] The nicotine content of tobacco products
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1939, 113 : 1145 - 1145
  • [5] PENNSYLVANIA POLICYMAKERS' ATTITUDES & KNOWLEDGE REGARDING WATERPIPE TOBACCO SMOKING & ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
    Hoffman, Beth L.
    Tulikangas, Megan C.
    Shensa, Ariel
    James, A. Everette
    Colditz, Jason B.
    Primack, Brian A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S2048 - S2049
  • [6] Evaluation of nicotine in tobacco-free-nicotine commercial products
    Hellinghausen, Garrett
    Lee, Jauh T.
    Weatherly, Choyce A.
    Lopez, Diego A.
    Armstrong, Daniel W.
    [J]. DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS, 2017, 9 (06) : 944 - 948
  • [7] A nicotine delivery device without the nicotine? Tobacco industry development of low nicotine cigarettes
    Dunsby, J
    Bero, L
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2004, 13 (04) : 362 - 369
  • [8] On the nicotine in tobacco growing by-products.
    Chuard, E
    Mellet, R
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS HEBDOMADAIRES DES SEANCES DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES, 1914, 159 : 208 - 210
  • [9] NICOTINE ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL TOBACCO PRODUCTS
    GOTTSCHO, AM
    LIN, JL
    DUCK, WN
    LOSTY, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS, 1988, 71 (06): : 1110 - 1115
  • [10] NICOTINE MISPERCEPTION AND TOBACCO PRODUCTS USE
    Feldman, Robert
    Shi, Rui
    Clark, Pamela
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 25 : S11 - S11