Feasibility of monitoring techniques for substances mobilised by CO2 storage in geological formations

被引:10
|
作者
Stalker, Linda [1 ,2 ]
Noble, Ryan [2 ]
Pejcic, Bobby [2 ]
Leybourne, Matthew [3 ]
Hortle, Allison [1 ,2 ]
Michael, Karsten [1 ,2 ]
Dixon, Tim [4 ]
Basava-Reddi, Ludmilla [4 ]
机构
[1] CO2CRC, Ground Floor,NFF House,14-16 Brisbane Ave, Barton, ACT 2600, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Earth Sci & Resource Engn, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[3] GNS, Avalon 5010, New Zealand
[4] IEA GHG, Orchard Business Ctr, Cheltenham GL52 7RZ, Glos, England
关键词
carbon storage; tools; sensors; geophysics; geochemistry; hydrocarbons; biological; HYDROCARBONS; PRESSURE; PROJECT; SENSORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2012.06.039
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
When a large volume of CO2 is injected into a geological formation this can lead to the mobilisation of substances of a chemical and physical nature. The purpose of this IEA GHG study([1]) was to identify typical substances that could be mobilised during geosequestration and to evaluate potential tools for monitoring these substances. This project reviewed the scientific literature patent applications and industry publications relevant to the current monitoring of chemical and physical processes due to CO2-formation water-rock interactions from the deep subsurface through to the soil/water interface. Four major areas were identified for review: 1-physical effects, including pressure effects or displacement of fluids; 2 - geochemical effects, including dissolution of reservoir and seal rocks, as well as the potential for mobilisation of heavy metals; 3 - shallow/surface effects, potential nutrients/toxic compounds affecting soils and microbial communities, as well as groundwater quality; 4 - capture contaminant effects from coal fired plants and other point source emitters. The various processes have different degrees of impact in the three general monitoring domains: a) injection horizon (depleted hydrocarbon reservoir, saline formation), b) above-zone interval (zone directly overlying the seal of the storage interval), and c) shallow subsurface (potable groundwater aquifers, soil). Understanding these processes and mapping their distribution aids in the identification of potential monitoring tools and facilitates an assessment of their utility in a particular monitoring domain. Some tools already commonly deployed in other industries are highly applicable to the carbon storage industry; for example, downhole pressure gauges from the oil industry and water level loggers from the groundwater industry. In general, geophysical tools were found to be quite a mature method for identifying the presence of gas (hydrocarbons or CO2), but less so for observing mobilised substances and changes in salinity. Tools for measuring trace amounts of hydrocarbons in marine settings are able to be modified in order to be used for monitoring mobilised hydrocarbons entrained in capture emissions, from CO2/source rock interactions or ienhanced oil recovery processes, though many of the tools are not compound specific as yet. The aim of the project is to provide an understanding of the availability of conventional and novel tools for monitoring and verification (M&V) during CO2 injection. Some of these tools have been successfully employed in current carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects or in alternative applications, such as mineral exploration and ecological studies. (C) 2012 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of SINTEF Energi AS
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 448
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monitoring techniques of CO2 geological storage and its application analysis
    Ren, Shao-Ran
    Ren, Bo
    Li, Yong-Zhao
    Zhang, Liang
    Kang, Wan-Li
    Liu, Yun-Cheng
    Chen, Guo-Li
    Zhang, Hua
    [J]. Zhongguo Shiyou Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2012, 36 (01): : 106 - 111
  • [2] CO2 sequestration in subsurface geological formations: A review of trapping mechanisms and monitoring techniques
    Massarweh, Osama
    Abushaikha, Ahmad S.
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2024, 253
  • [3] Numerical simulation of CO2 storage in geological formations.
    Class, H
    Bielinski, A
    Helmig, R
    Kopp, A
    Ebigbo, A
    [J]. CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2006, 78 (04) : 445 - 452
  • [4] A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches
    Ajayi, Temitope
    Gomes, Jorge Salgado
    Bera, Achinta
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (05) : 1028 - 1063
  • [5] A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling,monitoring and capacity estimation approaches
    Temitope Ajayi
    Jorge Salgado Gomes
    Achinta Bera
    [J]. Petroleum Science, 2019, 16 (05) : 1028 - 1063
  • [6] Feasibility study of CO2 geological storage in China
    Yanfeng Liu
    [J]. Acta Geochimica, 2006, (S1) : 280 - 280
  • [7] Feasibility study of CO2 geological storage in China
    Yanfeng Liu
    Xiaohui Lu
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, 2006, 25 (Suppl 1): : 280 - 280
  • [8] A study of the effect of impurities on CO2 storage capacity in geological formations
    Wang, Jinsheng
    Wang, Zhiyu
    Ryan, David
    Lan, Christopher
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 42 : 132 - 137
  • [9] Prospects for Geological Storage of CO2 in Carbonate Formations of the Adriatic Offshore
    Saftic, Bruno
    Bralic, Nikolina
    Rukavina, David
    Kolenkovic Mocilac, Iva
    Cvetkovic, Marko
    [J]. MINERALS, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [10] An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
    Kelemen, Peter
    Benson, Sally M. M.
    Pilorge, Helene
    Psarras, Peter
    Wilcox, Jennifer
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2019, 1